So 16 pages to explain there is a correlation between price and adoption? no fucking shit, sherlock.
No need to be an asshole, if you dont have anything constructive to add then why bother?
It just makes you like like a moron!
It may make me look like an asshole, but not a moron. Who the hell would it be news to that there is a correlation between usage and price? Why didn't this guy write 16 pages on explaining that there is a correlation between the sun being out and daytime?
I didn't write that article , I don't profit from it.
I said Metcalfe is a mystery to me
I said 0.57 R^2 seems low to me (compared to other models, say SF by PlanB having way higher R2)
I said the conclusion are quite vague about price target
Yet I try to understand something new.
I used some Metcalfe Law based valuation when I first invested in bitcoin (others were gold capitalisation comparisons and net worth allocation hypothesis): this is why I am still interested in Metcalfe laws.
No need to be a moron/asshole, just bring your consideration here.