It may make me look like an asshole, but not a moron. Who the hell would it be news to that there is a correlation between usage and price? Why didn't this guy write 16 pages on explaining that there is a correlation between the sun being out and daytime?
It's actually a more nuanced way of explaining (breaking down) the importance of adoption/use. People always say that adoption relates to price appreciation, but fail to go further than that.
I can say the price has gone up to $14k because of an increase in demand, but what's that worth when you keep it at that? It would make sense to actually explain why the price has gone up, where the demand comes from, etc.
Coming back to the article, it's a long read but still somewhat hocus pocus to me. It can also be me as a simple being needing some catching up to do and widen my general field of interest.