Decentralized exchanges are good choices, because they usually ask low listing fees or give free listings; and no KYC-requirement is another plus point. However, the main disadvantage of decentralized exchange are their low volume; most of them have very low daily volume, compare to centralized exchanges. I don't understand why you claim decentralized exchanges , or AtomicDEX in particular, has no risks of hack. Would you mind explaining more about that, please.
This is the phenomen which I can't grasp until now. We have all waiting for good DEEX or P2P exchanges.
People funded multiple ICO's with millions of USD only to get one running. Today there are multiple high-quality peer to peer exchanges and nobody is using them, to be honest. Why?
They are safer, there are almost no fees, for sure lower as on other exchanges, no KYC, no point of failure. And there is no volume on all of them.
I think a lot of people has a bad experience when they used the first exchange of such type Etherdelta. We all know that it was a pain to use it. Slow, there were no advanced orders and hall exchange was very limited.