And if they ask we will tell them, the drugs and that it is a proprietary treatment and they will be bound by the NDA.
When you will have thousands of clients, you will never find out who of them could be a spy. That's why, I don't think that NDA will be effective.
By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?
By the way, if someone will try to use your method without your supervising and will get bad effects, could he go to court to try to get money from you?
I want to try and answer all these questions at once. First with all the disclaimers we will on our website and that people will have to sign we will legally be protected if someone tries on their one.
The bigger question I want to address is the one about it is inevitable that after treating 1000's of dogs and people the word will get out. Yes you are correct although it has not gotten out of China with the hospitals there since 2009. But I am sure it will. So as part of our promotion we are going to make sure people understand one thing.
Who would you rather be treated by or have your dog treated by (1) the company whose has the inventor of the treatment as their Chief Science Officer so that if anything needs to be addressed or adjusted in the treatment it can be handled quickly and properly. Or (2) a company that found out about it and are doing it on their own, with NO past research to guide them, NO past use of the treatment since 2009 to guide them and NO inventor of the treatment to help them if needed.
We know that even if we had 100 Canine Cancer Centers we could not treat all the dogs with cancer in the US. So eventually we will start licensing out the treatment which will include full support on the treatment.