Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP
BUT nobody else is even allowed to complain about it.
You're allowed to complain all you like, but man....when you keep writing long screeds like this one, don't expect people to even finish reading, much less give you any credibility. Nobody is censoring dissent here. It just happens that your arguments don't garner a lot of support, which is a fact that you keep missing.Funny how when tecshare is dead wrong about something he just ignores it like it never happened.
In his defense, a lot of people do the exact same thing whether they're right or wrong.This is the first thread that he's run away from as far as I can remember. Normally he can't stand not having the last word.
Maybe he's growing up. Hey, he included me on his trust list, which is something I never expected. But I suspect he won't stop being such a hothead. That's apparently in his nature--and the thread isn't locked yet, so there's still time for him to come back and give his retort.1. Independently verifiable observable instances do not require the person presenting them to have ANY credibility.
2. There is NO argument, the post above demonstrates clear and undeniable double standards.
3. To "garner support" in meta for highlighting UNDENIABLE PROBLEMS with the systems of control is impossible since the people that frequent meta are those that benefit the most from preventing changes taking place, and will deny any problems exist. Like yourself.
Example.
VOD - comes to our self moderated thread and makes the same accusation 2x that OG is a LIAR and untrustworthy . We allowed it 2x but told him he MUST present clear corroborating evidence to keep plastering the same assumption on our self moderated thread and deleted his 3rd accusation claiming THE SAME THING. He then gives us RED TRUST claiming this is untrustworthy?? WTF even if we had removed ALL 3 instances of his unsubstantiated claims it would not be untrustworthy, but we allowed it to remain there the first 2 x
On our other self moderated threads, other idiots turn up and make ACCUSATIONS or statements again with NO corroborating evidence or even attempting to validate their claims.. We deleted those and received more RED TRUST.
WE ON THE OTHER HAND ask hhampuz a question and EVEN VALIDATE THE QUESTIONS WITH CLEAR UNDENIABLE OBSERVABLE INSTANCES THAT NOBODY EVEN ATTEMPTED TO REFUTE OR DENY BECAUSE THEY CAN NOT ....what happens?
?? we get red trust for LYING??? DEFAMATION??? This is ridiculous and observably a broken system to even allow this. LOL this is independently verifiable. We don't require support for any argument.
The FACT you are unable to still grasp this point, and still believe that one must be "credible" to present observable instances that are independently verifiable is quite amusing.
The FACT you are being paid to output this low functioning drivel is certainly something that should be questioned when being one of a tiny handful of people being paid to post at the very highest rates on the entire board. Really such campaigns should be called to explain their choices and provide explanation if these posters make far to many public posts that are debunked and of low to negative value.
We say again. These types of net negative posts are more damaging than pure spam. Those readers that are placing faith in gamed nonsense like merit may take your words to have some value when they are grossly net negative.
There is clear PRESSURE both in terms of REWARD (merits) and PUNISHMENT (double standards trust abuse) to censor and crush free speech. This has been mitigated slightly with the new trust system, however still much work to do if you really want to see a fair(er) environment for all members.