Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: CopperMembership ~ real Member rank in campaigns - Is it fair ?
by
hd49728
on 17/08/2019, 07:19:21 UTC
What LoyceV did is great, but I still think LoyceV has too high requirements. 35 merits for Member rank, which made me sad months ago. Managers should have requirements like LoyceV, 10 - 15 - 20 merits is enough for that rank, I think.
Tongue
You know it's impossible, unless signature usage is tightly controlled by this forum and all service/manager are forced to use Content Management System (CMS) provided by this forum to run signature campaign. Is this what you meant?

Or do you mean Copper Member shouldn't get member's rank signature benefit and change it with something else?

It might become a trend, if there is no preventive solution. We all clearly see the fact that scam projects open their threads with Copper Member accounts, if not high rank accounts (probably real-own accounts from their team members or bought accounts).
And if there is no solution, bounties might motivate spammers to buy CopperMembership and keep spaming.
As I wrote above, they pay some money, so they make post more carefully - enough to not be banned, but still far from constructive.
However I don't think many people's using copper membership for signature, if there is manager should choose at least good poster.
Sure. If there are solutions for Yobit, there are solutions for others; especially Copper Spammers.
Quote
But, I think and believe admin could disable signature for copper membership ( likely it will not happen). Copper membership was implemented in order to post with image & some other benefits, (signature campaign wasn't intention of copper membership).