Relaying another message:
In case you are new to bitcoin, selling 821,050 bitcoins is some serious showing of "proof of keys".
How quickly the myopicfools[flippant trolls] around here forget Craig crashed the BTC price from $6k to $3k:
Also it was on purpose that Craig Wright (who is just a pawn or front man actor for the globalists) was tasked to act like a fool, so that everyone would dismiss his warning. The globalists (who created Bitcoin) have fabricated a masterplan. Again I will link you to the information as follows:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157901.msg52251343#msg52251343
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52254095#msg52254095
STT, you need to read the Rogue Wave thread discussion. Also youre conflating BSV with the legacy, immutable Bitcoin, so it seems you really havent read much at all. You are ostensibly clueless about the relative economic impacts of a SegWit anyone can spend donations booty taking attack versus what you observed Craig do late last year. What he did late last year was just a tiny thing compared to what is coming in May. Here is a link to the thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157964.0
Yes, but as I wrote in one of the recent posts, Im concerned that soon well be prevented from cashing out.
Realize after the SegWit donations booty taking attack, legacy immutable Bitcoin (not BSV) which survives (as Core is destroyed) is going to be viewed as a the theft-coin. Also in theory Craig may bankrupt the exchanges who deal in SegWit addresses for their BTC. Perhaps even all the institutions hodling Bakkt futures will see their BTC go poof and then its gone if Bakkt doesnt follow my advice to hodl in 1 legacy addresses (I did message them about it, they didnt reply and they have promoted a roundtable discussion with Adam Back as a guest speaker). The powers-that-be ostensibly deem its necessary to destroy public confidence in decentralized cryptocurrency so that they can bring in centralized Libra as the alternative. So the cratering of the cryptocosm will be intentional and they dont care about low BTC prices for a few years because they have a long-term plan horizon. Have you read this linked post about the BOE governor saying Libra should replace the U.S. dollar:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157901.msg52251343#msg52251343
Also today Trumps administration announced that Chinese drug lords are using Bitcoin. And here is another reason BTC is becoming tainted:
So make sure all your paperwork is in order. Proof of source of funds, etc. Even then, the world is going to turn very unfair. And you may simply be denied, as non-VIP Americans were denied foreign bank accounts by the FATCA.
The Bitcoin party might be coming to a close for many of us. Perhaps adjust our expectations.
Nonsense. A soft fork is not a fork because it doesnt force the hodlers of BTC to make a decision. Read the Rogue Wave thread and educate yourself.
BSV is nothing but a decoy shitcoin. Craigs globalist backers are fooling you. They will force Core to fork off and destroy itself. What remains will be the legacy, immutable Bitcoin.
You didn't explain "why this matters".
Hint: It doesn't .... at best a large/majority miner can disrupt the system ... they cannot attack it in any other effective way. But this "power of disruption" applies to any other large player in any (!!!) other type of system. It's the natural state of things.
What you wrote is Not Even Wrong.
Youre off in left field derp.
Without decentralization, theres the potential for censorship and lack of permissionless system. And thus its no better than Facebook Libra. And Libra will launch with a billion prospective users.
More nonsense. The dichotomy is between immutable and variable blocksize. The former is a decentralized Schelling point and the latter is only centralized. Period.
Thus we can now ignore you.
Youre lying. I already referred you to the detailed discussion I had with @jbreher which we have somewhat summarized again.
Not ignored.
Satoshi actually did not respond again in the thread where the pleas were made. And then he conveniently disappeared. He globalist friends who control Wikileaks (Assange was living with Rothschilds attorney) conveniently had it start accepting BTC payments so Satoshi could make an excuse to disappear without addressing the pleas for raising the blocksize limit.
How much more disinformation are you going to spew in this thread?
Quote from: Shelby Moore
Why are people still obsessed with this douchebag? Proof of keys or GTFO. It is the simplest way to prove he is Satoshi. None of this foolish pageantry. Only newbies are hooked to his BSV bullshit.
In case you are new to bitcoin, selling 821,050 bitcoins is some serious showing of "proof of keys".
How quickly the myopic
Also it was on purpose that Craig Wright (who is just a pawn or front man actor for the globalists) was tasked to act like a fool, so that everyone would dismiss his warning. The globalists (who created Bitcoin) have fabricated a masterplan. Again I will link you to the information as follows:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157901.msg52251343#msg52251343
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52254095#msg52254095
I'll read any story but doesnt mean I like it or believe any of it to be true. The opposing dynamic here seems to be the idea of an open market protocol that allows any block size to be decided variably but also we have one person seemingly in control with which everyone else has to agree. So if the market doesnt agree, when does that become accepted or is the word of one person continually repeated as the correct direction.
So far BTC is the choice of the free market, I dont mind the idea of various protocols and ideas of what might work but I dont see why its always apparently in conflict with BTC.
I'm sure there is more then 1 unit for sale but even so, the market overall doesn't decide a price by the views of the minority even if it drops short term.
So far BTC is the choice of the free market, I dont mind the idea of various protocols and ideas of what might work but I dont see why its always apparently in conflict with BTC.
Quote
Craig Wright (CSW) has also confirmed my aforementioned expectation of selling Core BTC for Tether and other USD pegged assets:
Didn't we already have something similar to this and it ended up a buying opportunity if anything. A price established on low volume or with limited participation in the market is not especially accurate. I can sell someone my bitcoin for 100 dollars like we went back a few years but even if it showed on the graph as a valid order transacted, it doesn't have significance and nobody cares for more then a moment.I'm sure there is more then 1 unit for sale but even so, the market overall doesn't decide a price by the views of the minority even if it drops short term.
STT, you need to read the Rogue Wave thread discussion. Also youre conflating BSV with the legacy, immutable Bitcoin, so it seems you really havent read much at all. You are ostensibly clueless about the relative economic impacts of a SegWit anyone can spend donations booty taking attack versus what you observed Craig do late last year. What he did late last year was just a tiny thing compared to what is coming in May. Here is a link to the thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157964.0
@shelby, if we store our bitcoins in a legacy address (starts with a 1) are we OK if your hypothesis is true? Will our bitcoins be safe & usable on the original legacy immutable satoshi chain?
Yes, but as I wrote in one of the recent posts, Im concerned that soon well be prevented from cashing out.
Realize after the SegWit donations booty taking attack, legacy immutable Bitcoin (not BSV) which survives (as Core is destroyed) is going to be viewed as a the theft-coin. Also in theory Craig may bankrupt the exchanges who deal in SegWit addresses for their BTC. Perhaps even all the institutions hodling Bakkt futures will see their BTC go poof and then its gone if Bakkt doesnt follow my advice to hodl in 1 legacy addresses (I did message them about it, they didnt reply and they have promoted a roundtable discussion with Adam Back as a guest speaker). The powers-that-be ostensibly deem its necessary to destroy public confidence in decentralized cryptocurrency so that they can bring in centralized Libra as the alternative. So the cratering of the cryptocosm will be intentional and they dont care about low BTC prices for a few years because they have a long-term plan horizon. Have you read this linked post about the BOE governor saying Libra should replace the U.S. dollar:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157901.msg52251343#msg52251343
Also today Trumps administration announced that Chinese drug lords are using Bitcoin. And here is another reason BTC is becoming tainted:
Quote from: https://cointelegraph.com/news/3b-ponzi-scheme-is-now-allegedly-dumping-bitcoin-by-the-hundreds
In an attempt to curb the impact of the sell-offs, she has recommended that Peckshield and blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis analyze the flows more closely, noting that PlusToken appears to be moving their funds in small batches of 50-100 BTC into exchanges.
So make sure all your paperwork is in order. Proof of source of funds, etc. Even then, the world is going to turn very unfair. And you may simply be denied, as non-VIP Americans were denied foreign bank accounts by the FATCA.
The Bitcoin party might be coming to a close for many of us. Perhaps adjust our expectations.
BSV is bitcoin. Bitcoin is BSV. BSV is the original bitcoin protocol (or as as close as you get, right now - before undoing the remainder of the idiocy that BTC developers changed in the protocol)
BTC was forked away (segwit) from the original bitcoin protocol (which people refer today as BSV) in August 2017.
It was known as BCH for a while... but then BCH also forked away (and took the name with them).
BTC was forked away (segwit) from the original bitcoin protocol (which people refer today as BSV) in August 2017.
It was known as BCH for a while... but then BCH also forked away (and took the name with them).
Nonsense. A soft fork is not a fork because it doesnt force the hodlers of BTC to make a decision. Read the Rogue Wave thread and educate yourself.
BSV is nothing but a decoy shitcoin. Craigs globalist backers are fooling you. They will force Core to fork off and destroy itself. What remains will be the legacy, immutable Bitcoin.
Quote
Bitcoin certainly cant scale-out decentralized
You didn't explain "why this matters".
Hint: It doesn't .... at best a large/majority miner can disrupt the system ... they cannot attack it in any other effective way. But this "power of disruption" applies to any other large player in any (!!!) other type of system. It's the natural state of things.
What you wrote is Not Even Wrong.
Youre off in left field derp.
Without decentralization, theres the potential for censorship and lack of permissionless system. And thus its no better than Facebook Libra. And Libra will launch with a billion prospective users.
Small blocks doesn't change or stop this problem .... all it does is damage the usefulness of the blockchain.
More nonsense. The dichotomy is between immutable and variable blocksize. The former is a decentralized Schelling point and the latter is only centralized. Period.
The people who matter are those who say things about bitcoin which are both useful and correct.
Thus we can now ignore you.
It was ALWAYS discussed by satoshi as something which would need to be increased (and ultimately removed) before it actually LIMITED the available blockspace below the current number of tx.
Youre lying. I already referred you to the detailed discussion I had with @jbreher which we have somewhat summarized again.
Quote from: Shelby Moore
And then Satoshi conveniently ignored pleas to raise the 1 MB before he conveniently suddenly disappeared when those pleas started to reach a crescendo again.
Not ignored.
Satoshi actually did not respond again in the thread where the pleas were made. And then he conveniently disappeared. He globalist friends who control Wikileaks (Assange was living with Rothschilds attorney) conveniently had it start accepting BTC payments so Satoshi could make an excuse to disappear without addressing the pleas for raising the blocksize limit.
How much more disinformation are you going to spew in this thread?