Isn't it rather, that the judge confirmed CSW as Satoshi Nakamoto, because CSW has to pay half of Satoshi's Bitcoins?
Did the order say to pay half of Satoshi's Bitcoin? I don't think so. The current judgement doesn't prove anything as Craig is Satoshi. This case is not about "whether Craig is Satoshi" but about the rights over the bitcoin holdings, which Craig was allegedly trying to seize. In the due course, it was ordered that Kleiman be awarded 50 percent of the bitcoin and IPs that Wright held prior to Dec. 31, 2013.