Why do you keep rehashing this nonsense? According to the in-court version of your friend Craig, he can't access the bitcoin, so he can't give it to the Kleiman estate. He can't access the bitcoin because as the judge said, the Tulip Trust never existed. Craig has no coins, ergo Kleiman has no coins. Craig is still on the hook for $5 billion though.
I asked you this question in the BSV thread after you posted the same thing there, and you completely ignored it:
And this negates the ruling against Wright in what way?
What ruling, there is no ruling. The only thing certain Craig Wright has to pay some legal fees.