There are a handful of projects that are light years ahead of Xtrabytes in sectors such as supply chain. If we’re talking about all of crypto, then every project that has put out a product is ahead of Xtrabytes.

The team can point to their NDAs all they want, but the fact of the matter is that nothing has changed - no one outside of the Xtrabytes team has allegedly seen the code. That is not evidence or proof.

Let’s say Bernie Madoff had a business partner throughout his Ponzi scheme, and you were to ask that partner if Bernie was running a Ponzi scheme, what do you think they would say?

They’d say, ‘No! Of course not! It’s definitely not a Ponzi scheme!’ Because they’re part of the scam. They’re not going to sell out their partner.

It’s the same thing with Xtrabytes and its team. If the tech was real, they’d show it to someone outside the team.

Not to mention, isn’t it interesting how the lawyers from law firm they claim to be using, which is an IP law firm with a long, storied history, can’t understand the tech after months and months, but Danny and Golden just picked it right on up and understand it after 48 hours? That’s quite an amazing feat. I’m still not sure if that says more about Danny and Golden or the law firm. They might want to consider switching firms if this is the case.

I urge anyone to go and look through old posts from the team regarding the patents. What was being said in 2018 is the same thing being said now - ‘drawing diagrams, adding clarification, reviewing, finalizing, etc’. You can substitute out any recent post about the patents with a post from 2018 and I guarantee no one could tell the difference. They were drawing diagrams and adding clarification a year and a half ago. What happened to those diagrams? What happened to those documents? Why does it seem like they started the entire process over?

They talk about ‘useless forks’ all the time. Meanwhile, they don’t even have a product. They can hype it up all they want to try and pump the price, but it doesn’t matter. No one is listening until they release the tech. It actually makes more sense for them to not release it. It’s a shroedinger’s cat situation. They can claim the tech does everything under the sun when it’s under wraps. The minute they reveal it, the mystery is gone. For tech  that speaks for itself,  they sure seem invested in keeping it silent.

They want to parade around about how they’re going to have partnerships with giant corporations and whatnot, but no company would ever partner with a team that has had all this negative attention. Fighting with community members, silencing critics, doxxing people, etc - no company would ever want to be a part of that, no matter how good the tech is. If they ever release a product, my guess is that it will be extremely underwhelming.

My guess though is that they drag this patent thing out - blaming the law firm for delays, then they’ll blame the patent office for delays. Then, they’ll get denied, which they knew they would because the tech isn’t revolutionary, and they’ll use not getting the patents as an excuse to either close up shop or to continue stalling.