DELETE 15
LOL at the corrupt and shitty moderation on this board.
So look at this
Moronbozo is allowed to come to that thread and voice HIS double standards bullshit crying about alleged copy and paster for profit being on DT which he apparently feels very strongly about. However if you ask for clarity as to why he feels like that and present evidence he is not crying and screaming about this pals who are proven scammers and financially dangerous scum being on DT....
Yep the corrupt mod just deletes your post. WHY you may ask.... well that is a very good question isn't it. Mods obviously have very clear double standards here and are corrupt dirt bags themselves.
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
No, this is me ranting about someone adding plagiarist and content thief to default trust. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is second time this user ended up in DT and again person who caught goraset stealing their work and trying to pass it as their own for monetary gain ended up with negative trust
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2050090.0.
Someone should help moronbozo out here. Ranting and crying about someone "allegedly" copying and pasting for "allegedly" direct financial gain. This may or may not be true and this could be a valid and correct objection. BUT ON THE OTHER HAND moronbozo is well aware of the observable instances of CLEAR FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED WRONG DOING BY HIS PALS HERE
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.140and does not only NOT rant about them being added to DT but in some cases may be including them now or has included them to DT in the past HIMSELF.
The reader should therefore draw their own conclusions about moronbozo and his "rant".
Rather than encouraging DOUBLE STANDARDS he should insist ALL THOSE FOUND WITH INSTANCES OF CLEAR FINANCIAL WRONGDOING INCLUDING HIS PALS should be struck from DT.
So this default trust matter is perhaps relevant that he brings up but this should be taken in the context of his own actions and behaviors to those that have committed FAR WORSE crimes here.
I wonder what moronbozo has to say about that? I'm sure we are going to find out shortly.
What whistleblowers getting marked as untrustrworthy when there are no instances of financially motivated wrongdoing in their histories by those that are clearly scumbags and financially high risk or blatant scammers? this is bitcointalk this is the not uncommon and is not even frowned upon.
Perhaps it is just because he is not a "gang" member this rant only applies to him? is that right moronbozo?
Let's discuss the default trust changes and what is and what is not allowed according to you?
Of course the post is merited by foxpoop who ALSO has no problem including his pals who are observably guilty of far WORSE CRIMES. A couple of scum bags pushing their own double standards agenda with regards what is and what is not allowed in regards to the default trust list changes.
brilliant system, brilliant demonstration of clear corrupt double standards all rewarded with lots of lovely merits and getting paid to spam at the highest rates of pay on bitcointalk. LOL
moronbozo does not likely see the clear double standards nor why it is not trolling to correctly name him with a far more accurate descriptive name like moronbozo.
DELETE 16
Yep moronbozo realizing he has been sprung spouting clear double standards obviously reports the posts to the brain dead corrupt shitty mods for deletion. They can not defeat you in debate so they delete your post. This place is getting worse daily due to the mods and scum on DT.
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
No, this is me ranting about someone adding plagiarist and content thief to default trust. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is second time this user ended up in DT and again person who caught goraset stealing their work and trying to pass it as their own for monetary gain ended up with negative trust
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2050090.0.
This may or may not be true and this could be a valid and correct objection.
If you only have spent time to read thread instead writing wall of text which I stopped reading exactly here you would have seen what I am talking about.
How fortunate for you to stop reading right before we are calling you out for be a double standards scam supporting piece of dirt.
How about you answer that in relation to your
opinions " rants" on the default trust changes.
Here go have another read moronbozo. (take time to recoup first) and see how we are demonstrating to the reader that your "opinions" on the changes to default trust are full of double standards and you are an idiot to think people do not notice this.
What you don't want to give your side of WHY you have no problem with scammers like lauda, auction scammers like tman, doxers like vod , willing scam facilitators like nutildah...all of which are trust abusers some of which are implicated is serious extortion and shady escrow being on default trust but you do have a problem with someone that copied someone elses words apparently and apparently for financial gain? seems strange.
Why don't you care to address that so the reader can compare your reasoning on who and who is not allowed to be in the default trust changes that take place??
There is going to be NO DOUBLE STANDARDS that slip past now. We and our friends will be keeping on topic and relevant whilst bringing them to light at every instance.
These default trust changes have upset you. We want to understand why in the context of your prior behaviors and opinions.
If it is not permitted to gain some clarity to your "opinions" on the default trust changes then your opinions should not be permitted to be here either.
If it is simply a thread to list the changes and nothing else permitted, we are fine with that so long as everyone is held to the same rules.
[/quote]
DELETE 17
so now the pharmacist comes along with their observably false accusations and usual low functioning spew. However now when we raise OUR opinion regarding this observable scum bag being on DT compared to the person moronbozo is crying about who copied some words..... IT IS DELETED.
So only moronbozo is allowed to have an opinion or voice concerns on who is no DT. You are not allowed to present observable instances that demonstrate clearly that GANG members held to the same standards certainly should not be there.
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
True, but don't tell me you expect anything more from TOAA. It's nonstop keyboard diarrhea, just like the flow from cryptohunter. Not surprising.
She is back on ignore, I don't think I will miss anything valuable from TOAA's posts. This was very bad attempt to change subject from "
plagiarist and thief in DT" to whatever she wrote there.
it seems moronbozo elected to run away rather than explain his clear double standards.
Now we are expecting pharmacist to do the same, or try crying to a corrupt mod to claim our asking for clarity on a person RANTS regarding changes to default trust list is off topic but their seemingly double standards rants are not off topic. This is how bitcointalk has come to operate now. You (DT members) get to rant your opinions that are related to the op but if someone asks for clarity on those opinions (that are clearly related to the op) or disagree.. they can be deleted as offtopic and irrelevant . Although clearly it is in the readers interest to gain a full understanding of those opinions if they are indeed relevant and on topic enough to remain in place. A little complex to follow if you are moronbozo or thepharmacist but those not suffering from sub human levels of intelligence should be okay.
So moronbozo did a runner rather than explain his obviously strange opinion in the context of his prior behaviors and actions. What else could that double standards dirt bag do? admit he supports on DT observable scammers and really dangerous scum but does not like those that copy words on there. haha
The pharmacist has smoke pouring from its ears thinking " why the fuck did I poke my sneaky racist trolling sock puppet sig spamming nose into this again?? doh" now what can I do to avoid people realizing that I am less worthy of being on DT than someone that seems to have done less wrong than myself. oh no... I mean a direct comparison of my prior observable behaviors and this person makes him look LESS bad than myself. hahahaha
Hurry back smarmacist we can't wait to pull you apart in public.
Default trust list changes and DT members opinions on those changes when scrutinized . Such fun to be had.DELETE 18
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
No, this is me ranting about someone adding plagiarist and content thief to default trust. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is second time this user ended up in DT and again person who caught goraset stealing their work and trying to pass it as their own for monetary gain ended up with negative trust
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2050090.0.
Someone should help moronbozo out here. Ranting and crying about someone "allegedly" copying and pasting for "allegedly" direct financial gain. This may or may not be true and this could be a valid and correct objection. BUT ON THE OTHER HAND moronbozo is well aware of the observable instances of CLEAR FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED WRONG DOING BY HIS PALS HERE
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.140and does not only NOT rant about them being added to DT but in some cases may be including them now or has included them to DT in the past HIMSELF.
The reader should therefore draw their own conclusions about moronbozo and his "rant".
Rather than encouraging DOUBLE STANDARDS he should insist ALL THOSE FOUND WITH INSTANCES OF CLEAR FINANCIAL WRONGDOING INCLUDING HIS PALS should be struck from DT.
So this default trust matter is perhaps relevant that he brings up but this should be taken in the context of his own actions and behaviors to those that have committed FAR WORSE crimes here.
I wonder what moronbozo has to say about that? I'm sure we are going to find out shortly.
What whistleblowers getting marked as untrustrworthy when there are no instances of financially motivated wrongdoing in their histories by those that are clearly scumbags and financially high risk or blatant scammers? this is bitcointalk this is the not uncommon and is not even frowned upon.
Perhaps it is just because he is not a "gang" member this rant only applies to him? is that right moronbozo?
Let's discuss the default trust changes and what is and what is not allowed according to you?
Of course the post is merited by foxpoop who ALSO has no problem including his pals who are observably guilty of far WORSE CRIMES. A couple of scum bags pushing their own double standards agenda with regards what is and what is not allowed in regards to the default trust list changes.
brilliant system, brilliant demonstration of clear corrupt double standards all rewarded with lots of lovely merits and getting paid to spam at the highest rates of pay on bitcointalk. LOL
moronbozo does not likely see the clear double standards nor why it is not trolling to correctly name him with a far more accurate descriptive name like moronbozo.