I think this project is unfairly targeted for a payment that is overdue at the most for 3 or so months while other projects in the same situation but overdue for more than a year have not been complained about in the same way.
Such inconsistencies tend to happen regularly. I think people tend to get overzealous in calling others "scammers". Especially if they do not have active representation on bitcointalk.
So you think Talkstar is open this thread with no real grounds, and that he is
"unfairly targeting" BQT&IOU for not paying bounty participants x or xx months after the promised deadline? I think it's wrong to set things up in a way "They all do same things", so why BQT should be different.
Both myself and Talkstar have been in contact with BQT. With a previous allegation against them they provided all the information and did exactly what they said they would - leaving the previous allegation without foundation. They ran a successful ICO raising millions. Spent millions on building their project and paid their signature campaign participants. I see no reason why they would "scam" their bounty participants for a few dollars worth of tokens which they set aside for the bounty at the start of the project.
You say few $, but only one user is calculated they own him $444 at posting time (August 8.)
The table shows the amount of 2536.8 BQTX and 420 IOUX for the bounty on Twitter and Facebook. Which I have not received. According to coinmarketcap on August 8, this amount is $ 315 per BQTX campaign and $129 per IOUX. The total amount is $ 444.
Total amount of tokens in both bounty is 1 million tokens, so we are not talking about few $, but depending of tokens price much more money then that. Price of both token is go down, and BQT is from ATH $1.74 (May 20, 2019) now at only $0.08. So by "forgeting" to pay participants in time, they will maybe give them tokens that are much less valuable.
For example tvplus006 tokens BQTX 2536.8 x $0.08 = $202 / IOUX 420 x $0.23 = $96 - in total $298