- The far-fetched nature of the problems solved by the product.
- Lack of UTP before direct competitors - ETH and EOS.
- Strong centralization of the platform and token sale.
- There are no smart contracts, they hope for a non-public product TON.
- Unprofessional behavior of the founder with investors.
- The founder, not fulfilling past promises, gives new ones.
- Too few programmers for a product of this size.
- Lack of team responsibility to investors.
- Lack of information on risks taken by investors.
- A few signs of securities are the Utility token.
- Investors are not investors, but buyers of a non-working product.
- Investors are not investors, but buyers of a non-working product.
I can send you 100 BIP for testing this "a non-working product".
You can sell it (for example here
https://minter.1001btc.com/en/) or delegate in some validator (choose it here
https://minter.stakeholder.space/validator/overview/) and get about 0.5% a day (it is decreasing)
- A few signs of securities are the Utility token.
It was his decision because they use DPOS and delegators get revards. A lot of coins use it and what?
- The far-fetched nature of the problems solved by the product.
- Lack of UTP before direct competitors - ETH and EOS.
....
a lot of coins does not solve all problems and not so good as ETH and EOS are and what?
"and what" so on for every line