Do you mean like this very post. Because if it is not breaking the rules we are coming to your every thread and posting similar warnings with no corroborating evidence like you are. This post you just made is derailing since it seeks to deter discussion of the central points.

You are a fucking scum bag croatian dog. I will post that in your threads and tell people to avoid you scam supporting piece of shit. I will even bring corroborating observable instances and explanations of you supporting proven scammers so I will be at least validating my claims.

Don't feed rabid croatian dogs like moronbozo and his skanky croatian scamming pal lauda. I will be posting this all over your threads and if it is deleted and your post is not then there you go. DOUBLE STANDARDS CORRUPT MODERATION.

Reporting your post now.

Now no more off topic derailing low functioning spew from scammers and their supporters. Tackle the central point or fuck off.

At least you ADMIT you are breaking the rules  but when we reported it then the moderator marked the report BAD. Proves our point. The other way to see it is

That discussing the ACTUAL RESULTS of the default trust changes rather than dreaming up what MIGHT be the advantages and disadvantages of such a duff design could be MORE USEFUL for the reader. So this is why permitted flow needs to be defined and drilled down on. BUT THEN by that same token our post which again discusses the direct results SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN DELETED.  So either way the moderation is BIAS.


Anyway what further proof do we need.

" who made this cunt bleed" - on its own no attempt to make it relate it to the central points of the op or discuss the reasoning behind it  GETS MERITS and is marked BAD when we reported it.

Same here

" DONT FEED THE TROLL" - no example of trolling given and no reason as to Why this invalidates the observable instances or should prevent discussion of them on this thread. A PAID POST BY CHIPMIXER that breaks the rules, and then that fucking dirty weasel hilarious and co marks the report bad and gives it MERIT.

LOL

Then they get up in arms when people may say , the censorship and moderation here is bogus if you talk or mention certain things. This idiot mod has been sniping with merits, deleting our on topic posts THE LAST ONE WE DEBUNKED CLEARLY SUCHMOONS REASON FOR REPORTING IT AND DEMONSTRATED IT IS BIAS MODERATION (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5135599.msg51730433#msg51730433) so she ran off .. well.. rolled away.

We never used to report any posts here at all since we just thought the smart reader will just cast of these empty statements and bogus claims and get to the real meat of the debate. HOWEVER since this sneaky snitching fat pig such moon and others like pharmacist, moronbozo (the usual gang) reporting anything they want remaining hidden then you can not even have a fair debate because when they start losing (they never win EVER) they simply get corrupt CHIPMIXER spammer hilarious weasel or dumb fish to delete our posts away?


I mean often they will just randomly make provably false accusations then when you call them on it you are told that is off topic and it is deleted away ... so their accusation remains and it appears that you accept it is true??

FUCK OFF, that is not going to happen.

The rules MUST be applied fairly and equally to all members. Or we will never stop going on about it. This is how you create a fair and open society. The first instances of CLEAR INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIABLE BIAS you highlight it and say fuck off we will not stand for that. People who try it are cast out of positions of power and those that can be fair and apply the rules equally to all members are given a chance to remain there.