ABiNut has been included by TECSHARE
for as long as I can see:
What changed, is that TECSHARE reached DT1 (strength 0 instead of negative)
a few hours ago.
I checked the feedback I left. Yes, I called you out for being an alt account years ago. And that's exactly what my feedback means. I (as an individual) was convinced that the person that controlled your account had multiple accounts.
Your Reference link is a deleted post, and that thread doesn't show any evidence. You're on DT2 now, which means your feedback should be accurate and ideally convincing too. Can you convince me?
Note that having an alt-account by itself is not a valid reason to give red trust. You're included by TECSHARE, and I've often seen him ask for proper use of the Trust system. If you want to remain on DT2, it doesn't hurt to convince your DT1 "sponsor" that your feedback is accurate.
Now I'd be open to reasonable arguments but:
1) Your message to me is rude
Being on DT means you should have a thicker skin. Being rude shouldn't be the reason to leave red feedback on any account.
2) You're abusing the trust system by leaving false feedback
True. StonerStanley: until today, you hadn't sent any feedback, now you're retaliating. That doesn't help your case.
You should at least supply proper Reference links to your accusations.
i'm gonna contact theymos.
You're wasting your and his time. Feedback isn't moderated.
3) You're accusing me of being a scammer
Being on DT, that's not a reason to tag an account. You may want to read the arguments in
this thread, from when I received a similar incorrect tag.
But it's displayed if I set my trust list to default.
Add ;dt to any URL to view it as DT. Example:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=348604;dt