Probably a decent number of the readers of this thread have already recognized that you have a significantly large amount of misleading and misinformation in your posts that tend to also get caught in the weeds of some kind of irrelevance that leans more towards intentional than not.

Regarding your stupid-ass technical arguments, they frequently are stupid-ass because they either are misleading or they are put too much weight on improbable events, which is another form of misleading.

Since it seems quite unlikely that you are going to get banned, and every once in a blue moon, you do provide some helpful information, the best that many of us can do is to merely point out some of your misleading uses of technicalities and other nonsense that you post, that might come off as innocuous on its face. You are not the first to have been engaging in such, and likely not the last, even though you have established a bit of your own signature style in this thread in such seemingly intentional misleading and deceiving regards..

There are also some smart peeps who participate in this thread (and probably readers too), who have not seemed to have recognized the intentional misleadingness of a decent number of your posts, so they engage in behavior to give you the benefit of the doubt, even though many of the times, you don't really deserve such benefit of the doubt.  

Remember Jstolfi?  He was considered to be polite too, similar to your perceived persona, but Stolfi also wreaked a decent amount of havoc through his ongoing distortionary campaigning that lasted through much  of the 2014/2015 bear market, and Stolfi had similar but different patterns from your own.. and the time was different then, too in 2014/15, of course, so the attack vectors upon bitcoin were different then, too.