I gave up reporting this type of abuse a while ago. Sometimes I noticed that between making the report and it being actioned, pages of further crap had been posted.
On some threads where I think there is a risk of a very questionable scheme's bumping service actually succeeding in boosting credibility, I periodically post summaries of the spam and a warning about it, but rarely go to the lengths that JollyGood has on the basis that
Never wrestle with a pig.
You get covered in shit and the pig enjoys it.This is one of the things that should be looked into by an admin but it likely won't.
This.
If the senior management of the forum doesn't consider the thousands upon thousands of spam posts being made (solely to distort visitors' perception of the popularity of usually dubious schemes) to be a threat to the forum's credibility, then this conclusion seems inevitable
theymos wont stop these spammers because they are the reasons why bitcointalk.org has a lot o traffics.