Alex-11, if you refuse to prove, then why are you here making noise at this forum?  If you're making noise here without showing anything, it only makes people suspect that you are in good company with Armstrong.  This forum is about discussing what methods using Armstrong's stuffs really work.  How are you going to show it without providing proof?

Oh, I forgot.  Maybe you are another self-proclaimed "trading god" that never have any losses ever in their lifetime, just like Armstrong's perfect trading record, and no proof is ever needed, because Armstrong has his super-computer AI (like he "claims"), and that just makes him right, since Google has shown AI can beat human at the game Go, and that's the proof that Armstrong requires to show that his AI works, I bet.



Bikefront has a good point on the leverage and drawn down.  For example, if a successful trade from opening to closing had a maximum temporary loss of 20%, even when at the closing it was winning 30%, this particular trade canNOT be leveraged for more than 5X, because 20% x 5 = 100%, and brokerage house will liquidate your entire account when that happens.  So under this scenario, the "profitable" trade that gave you 30% gain on paper, is really 100% loss in reality.

In fact, I believe that brokerage house will liquidate your position way before reaching 20% * 5X = 100% loss.