I love this critical analysis of everyone I add to my trust list as if I obviously should be suspect, but any time I bring up say the inclusion of Nutilduhhh even though
the account was publicly offered for sale, no one bothers replying. Of course I am required to defend my inclusions but no one else in the clown car mob is. More rules for thee but not for me, that's Bitcointalk SOP.
I'm not the one going around adding new DT1 members from local boards one after another like you are. If you want to dig for flaws in my own trust system setup, feel free.
You want to REALLY know why I added those Turkish users? Because they were just barely off the DT and I wanted to see it more diverse.
Wrong. With the exception of Vispilio, they were all already on DT when you added them. Matthias added you in the
week of 6/22, along with a dozen other DT1s. He didn't become DT1 until 8/2. You added him to your trust list 3 hours later.
8/2/2019 5:33:52 PM Matthias9515* (2) trusts TECSHARE
8/2/2019 8:25:25 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts Matthias9515 (2)
This guy was made DT1 in the week of 6/29. You added him on 7/23, and when he failed to reciprocate in a period of 5 days, you dumped him:
7/23/2019 9:34:59 PM TECSHARE (0) trusts by rallier (2)
7/28/2019 3:18:28 AM TECSHARE (0) no longer trusts by rallier
Kalemder was made DT1 on 9/4/2019 at 12:35:13 AM. You included him 16 hours later.
bobita was made DT1 on 8/2/2019. You included him 2 days later.
mhanbostanci was re-added to DT1 on 9/4. You included him 3 days later.
Regardless, is "wanting to see it more diverse" a good reason to add people to your trust list?
Additionally because anyone the resident clowns exclude I immediately find interest in.
Is this also a good reason to add people to your trust list?