...
olegrey, I suggest you restart all of your counts from zero, and post your trades in real-time. On this page 317, you go from successful reversal 5 to 8, without posting ANY real-time trades.
Honestly, I can't recall most of your past posted real-time trades either.
If I make a claim about my magic formula combining moving average and MACD indicators, and simply post like you with some success & failure, but averaging out to be some good stuffs, NOBODY can tell whether I'm faking it or not, even when it is HINDSIGHT based.
I'm not accusing you of anything. But if the formula works, it will continue to work. I just want to see some 100% clean record.
And if you refuse to do that, it's fine. But that number is just good for you (or anyone else who wants to take it up by faith).
I think this response is appropriate. It is commonsense to be considerate, as simple as that. With considerate, I mean to be respectful of the need of others to verify what I say. For example, I posted a trade
here which is now verifiable because it has been quoted
here , and therefore I cannot modify this without being caught.
In olegrey's case, the reversals would need to be posted in advance at a minimum, and it would need to be clear whether they are daily or weekly. I cannot see that, so the quality of what olegrey is doing is exactly zero. I don't know why he is doing it. We know that many reversals are phantom reversals which Socrates creates after the fact. This has never been challenged successfully, and now olegrey is exposing himself to this hat trick. Wash, rinse and repeat.
And let's not forget that olegrey has built his strategy based on the data posted
here by bikefront in tabular form , so we are not requesting something that has not been shown to him before.
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.
Read this blog
starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See
armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.