Re: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content
Like any other user, he is free to leave negative ratings at will. He has little to no power in this system.
He was on DT2. That's relatively a fair amount of power.
It's not the hugest mistake in the world though as if one is expected to search a users entire post history for out of character drunken rants before including them..
The main problem I see is that TECSHARE included him specifically because Timelord excluded him. That's a dumb reason to add people to your trust list: because they are being excluded by other people... It should be about the contents of their trust ratings, and secondarily the contents of their trust lists... not about whether or not that person is being "harassed" by people you don't like.
I don't necessarily dislike gays if they are cool but I dislike flamers of any variety.. I've had gay friends but not so much ones you can tell are gay just by looking at them, or at the first sound of their voice.. No thanks.. Just my opinion..
If you are going to be tolerant I think you should be just as tolerant of the guy that doesn't like flamers as you are of the flamers themselves.. You don't have to like and befriend either one but respect their right to be whatever they are, but any sort of offensive violence coming from any camp is unacceptable and intolerable..
If you are going to be tolerant I think you should be just as tolerant of the guy that doesn't like flamers as you are of the flamers themselves.. You don't have to like and befriend either one but respect their right to be whatever they are, but any sort of offensive violence coming from any camp is unacceptable and intolerable..
What does any of this have to do the trust system?
As usual, you just take the parts of my words you want to respond to and ignore the rest. It is not just because he was harassed, it was WHY he was being harassed. Plenty of people are constantly harassed around here and I don't add them. He was being targeted for speaking out. FYI, I never had any conflict with Timelord until I spoke out about his abusive flags against some of the Turkish community (after first defending him from the same abuse BTW). I added BitcoinSupremo quite a while ago, not that timelines matter in your shitslinging narrative.
Like any other user, he is free to leave negative ratings at will. He has little to no power in this system. If he does start abusing any authority he has let me know and I will handle it one way or another.
So you will just go "lalalalala"?I have already told you that is publicly available information, so when you say "let me know", I did.
Until then, your complaints ring hollow and remain a transparent attack on my own reputation rather than a complaint about BitcoinSupremo.
Nonsense.This has just turned into an opportunity to attack TS rather than he/she who posted the offending post..
Yes, this thread turned into something for sure...TS's counter may not have been the best move given these revelations but neither is this thread the best way to bring it to TS's attention and solve the problem.. Drama..
So you made assumption that I knew that it was TECHSHARE who included BitcoinSupremo to trust list or you know that I knew that it was TECHARE who included BitcoinSupremo to his trust list?I reviewed the information you presented. It consists of little more than accusations and suspicions, as usual when targeting an individual here, much as you are attempting to do with me. Furthermore you didn't just "let me know", you tried to start a circus over it to defame me, clearly telegraphing your true intent of harming my reputation and not addressing your so called concerns about BitcoinSupremo.
He made the assumption because it is publicly available information. No one buys your feigned ignorance, especially with you personally pushing 2 or 3 threads, Vod starting one with a retaliatory negative rating, and the rest of the clowns all chiming in at once. This was clearly coordinated.