Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 3 from 1 user
Re: Appealing ban for Sharon
by
alanst
on 12/09/2019, 16:52:36 UTC
⭐ Merited by The Pharmacist (3)
If kingpin4321 was hacked on August 7 then Sharon is not responsible for the phishing attempts and the subsequent ban since the account was not in her control. Her posting on the same day doesn't seem relevant. Unless you have something else, like both accounts using the same IP on that day or later.

I mean it still sounds fishy (pun intended) that she didn't complain about the hack and kingpin4321's ban but technically she didn't evade a ban.
See the bill gator case for a precedent.

I didn't say Sharon was the one responsible for the phishing attempts but it's easy to get confused, I also had a hard time until I figured the timeline Smiley I would say that the fact that kingpin posted in January the same address that Sharon posted on the day kingpin was supposedly hacked, but before the actual password change (besides anything else I might have on top but will not go on about as they also read these boards Wink) is very relevant as that is what actually connected the accounts in the first place.