Re: Record of our deleted posts - permitted flow preventing relevant information
Delete 19
Obviously do not want other members that are the victims of DT RED TRUST TAGS double standards getting access to the correct ontopic and relevant evidence to support their claims in the initial post. Certainly on topic and relevant to their central point in the OP.
We agree in part with the OP that debate has no place as far as these members are concerned with the consistent and fair use of red tags. The rules do not apply to them only others.
Obviously do not want other members that are the victims of DT RED TRUST TAGS double standards getting access to the correct ontopic and relevant evidence to support their claims in the initial post. Certainly on topic and relevant to their central point in the OP.
We agree in part with the OP that debate has no place as far as these members are concerned with the consistent and fair use of red tags. The rules do not apply to them only others.
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
We support some of your claims.
We do not know if you objectively deserve red trust or not. So on that part we can not comment. However we would say that there is a strong case to demonstrate that "if" you deserve red trust many of those on DT should also have red trust.
To us a potential threat of being financially dangerous however probable, is not as BAD as a proven and objectively verifiable instances of scamming and attempting to deliberately facilitate scamming.
Certainly many DT members adolphin wolf, vod etc (not rank dependent) are spineless and employ foul double standards. This part is cause to complain about.
We have a few suggestions
1. Read this thread and research
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0
2. Ask the people here suchmoon, direwolf etc etc
their reasoning on why YOU a member demonstrating what they consider "possible or even highly probable" financially dangerous behaviors should have red trust or SCAM TAG
then check out their trust inclusions to see who they are saying should be part of the boards tiny selection of TRUSTED individuals.
You will likely notice they are claiming their friends who have observable histories of ACTUAL scamming, or attempting to facilitate scams for a price, Should be the members that we most trust here?
3. Realize that you will attract more red trust by "appealing" on meta board.
Suchmoon although a total and utter scum bag is not usually stupid enough to flagrantly and openly trust abuse. So if she has left you red trust then she is likely pretty certain she can defend her reasons for doing so. The best solution you can hope for is that she will then refuse to answer why auction scammers, those willing to facilitate scamming for a price and her even more shady old pal/alt lauda should deserve her support into the trust systems and yet you should be cast as a scammer.
We are hoping you can ask her to explain her behavior and reasoning.
First though take time to study the DT system, and educate yourself on the past histories of those that are now claiming YOU are worse than they and their friends are. Not just worse you are a scammer, they are the MOST trustworthy people on this forum.
Direwolf loves getting down and dirty in certain circumstances just not with you it seems. When lauda et al tells him to get down and dirty, down and very dirty does he get.
So to recap you are correct you are dealing with spineless weasels here. The red marks would require objective analysis but certainly should be reviewed in the full context of their own actions and the actions of their DT pals.
We want objective standards applied to all, not double standards.
Quote
Hello,
as always i keep roasting ignorant people accusing me of scamming, and as always after losing the argumentations they either
- delete the posts
- start a persecution battle spamming on my thread and reporting every message
- leave very stupid and non-fundend negative feedbacks (A guy that i never even talked with , from all the lending situation understood that i run a ponzi with 5% interest rate . Really Vod?
Now i want to say it once and for all, you silly jealous little spineless people, keep trying to stop my business. this is your life, when others build and succeed you feel bad with yourself and try to destroy it because you are NOTHING ELSE THAN A RANK ON A FORUM. I don't care a bit of redtrust. i have all kind of evidence that everyone can access to see i'm legit. I don't care if i'm only a member, and i don't care if you refuse to understand my explanations.
you disgust me.
Also notice how all the roasted users are high rank, most of them legendary. that is not a case. most high rank members are closed in their imaginary cocky fortress where they think they are always right simply because of the rank. NOPE. Grow some balls, and when you understand to have made a mistake, apology instead of acting as a spineless kid
as always i keep roasting ignorant people accusing me of scamming, and as always after losing the argumentations they either
- delete the posts
- start a persecution battle spamming on my thread and reporting every message
- leave very stupid and non-fundend negative feedbacks (A guy that i never even talked with , from all the lending situation understood that i run a ponzi with 5% interest rate . Really Vod?
Now i want to say it once and for all, you silly jealous little spineless people, keep trying to stop my business. this is your life, when others build and succeed you feel bad with yourself and try to destroy it because you are NOTHING ELSE THAN A RANK ON A FORUM. I don't care a bit of redtrust. i have all kind of evidence that everyone can access to see i'm legit. I don't care if i'm only a member, and i don't care if you refuse to understand my explanations.
you disgust me.
Also notice how all the roasted users are high rank, most of them legendary. that is not a case. most high rank members are closed in their imaginary cocky fortress where they think they are always right simply because of the rank. NOPE. Grow some balls, and when you understand to have made a mistake, apology instead of acting as a spineless kid
We support some of your claims.
We do not know if you objectively deserve red trust or not. So on that part we can not comment. However we would say that there is a strong case to demonstrate that "if" you deserve red trust many of those on DT should also have red trust.
To us a potential threat of being financially dangerous however probable, is not as BAD as a proven and objectively verifiable instances of scamming and attempting to deliberately facilitate scamming.
Certainly many DT members adolphin wolf, vod etc (not rank dependent) are spineless and employ foul double standards. This part is cause to complain about.
We have a few suggestions
1. Read this thread and research
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0
2. Ask the people here suchmoon, direwolf etc etc
their reasoning on why YOU a member demonstrating what they consider "possible or even highly probable" financially dangerous behaviors should have red trust or SCAM TAG
then check out their trust inclusions to see who they are saying should be part of the boards tiny selection of TRUSTED individuals.
You will likely notice they are claiming their friends who have observable histories of ACTUAL scamming, or attempting to facilitate scams for a price, Should be the members that we most trust here?
3. Realize that you will attract more red trust by "appealing" on meta board.
Suchmoon although a total and utter scum bag is not usually stupid enough to flagrantly and openly trust abuse. So if she has left you red trust then she is likely pretty certain she can defend her reasons for doing so. The best solution you can hope for is that she will then refuse to answer why auction scammers, those willing to facilitate scamming for a price and her even more shady old pal/alt lauda should deserve her support into the trust systems and yet you should be cast as a scammer.
We are hoping you can ask her to explain her behavior and reasoning.
First though take time to study the DT system, and educate yourself on the past histories of those that are now claiming YOU are worse than they and their friends are. Not just worse you are a scammer, they are the MOST trustworthy people on this forum.
Direwolf loves getting down and dirty in certain circumstances just not with you it seems. When lauda et al tells him to get down and dirty, down and very dirty does he get.
So to recap you are correct you are dealing with spineless weasels here. The red marks would require objective analysis but certainly should be reviewed in the full context of their own actions and the actions of their DT pals.
We want objective standards applied to all, not double standards.