Re: Record of our deleted posts - permitted flow preventing relevant information
Delete 20
More clear evidence of on topic relevant information being deleted to conceal the truth. This is why moderators like hilarious and co should not be employed by chipmixer. He will not remove 1 line insults and off topic low value garbage that seeks to derail from our threads and marks them BAD. Fucking pussy and weasel that he is.
Delete 21
Explaining clearly why the post is on topic and relevant.
More clear evidence of on topic relevant information being deleted to conceal the truth. This is why moderators like hilarious and co should not be employed by chipmixer. He will not remove 1 line insults and off topic low value garbage that seeks to derail from our threads and marks them BAD. Fucking pussy and weasel that he is.
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
This is a good move. We agree that UNLESS you find a project you really believe in and wish to support then there is no reason to be wearing a sig for financial gain.
You should only make posts that you feel add value and not feel you HAVE to post to meet a quota OR that you are wasting the opportunity to make money.
What the pharmacist just said above is CLEARLY NOT TRUE. He is a financially motivated shit poster and has been caught red handed being extra greedy and sneaky and using his racist trolling sock puppet HugeBlackWoman. He was caught because he was NOT SATISFIED with spamming 2 sigs he was trying to spam for the maximum rates he could get and was swapping from one scampaign to another.
This clearly demonstrates you can not trust what he tells you. I mean is he claiming now that he would be racist trolling for free ANYWAY? or that he was not trying to jump out of one campaign to another for GREATER REWARDS??
He even admitted here he feels his greatest achievement ever since being a members was GETTING ON TO A HIGHLY PAID SIG CAMPAIGN ....
You can not trust the "REASONS" these people give for spamming the low value garbage for the highest rates.
However, well done to the OP. Become a real enthusiast for this movement and only post when you are certain to be adding additional value.
Sadly suchmoon just decided to demonstrate she can no longer resist joining her "pals" to spam CHIPMIXER all over meta board.
You have to wonder at the dumbo who thinks having 10 CHIPMIXER sigs per thread in meta is better for CHIPMIXER than 5 CHIPMIXER sigs per thread. LOL
At least now you can be free of the forced posting mandate of these kind of campaigns.
All meta posters should be sig free. You are setting a good example. Well done.
Quote
This probably isn't anything too interesting for other people, but it is for me.
I'm leaving my signature campaign and will not join any other ones for some time.
Mind you, I've been in a signature campaign constantly since 2014, so it's a pretty big step for me to just walk away from them.
I just don't want to deal with the hassle anymore, you know, having to post X amount of times per week...
Now, I doubt I will be any less active, but now I can purely post for fun without actually having to post.
The campaigns I've been in, were always great, never had any issues with the campaign managers, but after a while the obligation to post starts to wear on you.
I've probably spend some time responding to topics I wasn't really interested in, so it's great that I don't have to do that anymore...
I just thought this deserved to be put in a topic, hehe, I could almost shed a tear because being in a signature campaign was part of my life for so long.
Anyway, this might inspire others to take a break from signature campaigns and just enjoy Bitcointalk for what it is, without expecting payment for it
I'll probably have way more time to spend on my Steemit blog now and to participate with interesting projects here on Bitcointalk.
Had my first Bitcointalk meetup the other week, plus I'm participating in a very cool project, so I doubt that I'll spend any less time on here.
See y'all around and this time you can be 100% sure that whatever I say is because I mean it, instead of upping my post count. (Really, you can never be 100% sure when someone's in a signature campaign, no offence)
I'm leaving my signature campaign and will not join any other ones for some time.
Mind you, I've been in a signature campaign constantly since 2014, so it's a pretty big step for me to just walk away from them.
I just don't want to deal with the hassle anymore, you know, having to post X amount of times per week...
Now, I doubt I will be any less active, but now I can purely post for fun without actually having to post.
The campaigns I've been in, were always great, never had any issues with the campaign managers, but after a while the obligation to post starts to wear on you.
I've probably spend some time responding to topics I wasn't really interested in, so it's great that I don't have to do that anymore...
I just thought this deserved to be put in a topic, hehe, I could almost shed a tear because being in a signature campaign was part of my life for so long.
Anyway, this might inspire others to take a break from signature campaigns and just enjoy Bitcointalk for what it is, without expecting payment for it
I'll probably have way more time to spend on my Steemit blog now and to participate with interesting projects here on Bitcointalk.
Had my first Bitcointalk meetup the other week, plus I'm participating in a very cool project, so I doubt that I'll spend any less time on here.
See y'all around and this time you can be 100% sure that whatever I say is because I mean it, instead of upping my post count. (Really, you can never be 100% sure when someone's in a signature campaign, no offence)
This is a good move. We agree that UNLESS you find a project you really believe in and wish to support then there is no reason to be wearing a sig for financial gain.
You should only make posts that you feel add value and not feel you HAVE to post to meet a quota OR that you are wasting the opportunity to make money.
What the pharmacist just said above is CLEARLY NOT TRUE. He is a financially motivated shit poster and has been caught red handed being extra greedy and sneaky and using his racist trolling sock puppet HugeBlackWoman. He was caught because he was NOT SATISFIED with spamming 2 sigs he was trying to spam for the maximum rates he could get and was swapping from one scampaign to another.
This clearly demonstrates you can not trust what he tells you. I mean is he claiming now that he would be racist trolling for free ANYWAY? or that he was not trying to jump out of one campaign to another for GREATER REWARDS??
He even admitted here he feels his greatest achievement ever since being a members was GETTING ON TO A HIGHLY PAID SIG CAMPAIGN ....
You can not trust the "REASONS" these people give for spamming the low value garbage for the highest rates.
However, well done to the OP. Become a real enthusiast for this movement and only post when you are certain to be adding additional value.
Sadly suchmoon just decided to demonstrate she can no longer resist joining her "pals" to spam CHIPMIXER all over meta board.
You have to wonder at the dumbo who thinks having 10 CHIPMIXER sigs per thread in meta is better for CHIPMIXER than 5 CHIPMIXER sigs per thread. LOL
At least now you can be free of the forced posting mandate of these kind of campaigns.
All meta posters should be sig free. You are setting a good example. Well done.
Delete 21
Explaining clearly why the post is on topic and relevant.
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
I've been in the Crypto-Games & Bitsler campaigns, they both had a 25 posts per week requirement.
Yeah, I totally get the "leaving money on the table" argument and that's why I'm still kinda leaving it open to join a campaign in the future.
Now it's just that I really do not have any external incentive to post, except pure interest, it just feels liberating in a way.
And wow, how did this turn into a rant against The Pharmacist, that really wasn't my intention.
I really didn't mean to shame people who were still active in signature campaigns, heck I have no moral qualms against people who are active in signature campaigns.
The posts I've seen The Pharmacist make were always on point, so I really don't agree with painting them in such a bad light.
Not every reply needs to be overly intellectual, sometimes people just enjoy to read regular stuff too...
Hey, that could very well be the case, I do think I'd probably join a campaign without minimum post requirements.
OR
Maybe I'll just advertise a project that I'm really interested in and slap a referral link of my own on that.
I won't be making the same kind of money as in a regular Bitcoin signature campaign, but at least I'll have a warm fuzzy feeling
This thread has not turned into a rant against ANY person. It is simply how the permitted flow works. You say you left the sig campaign and say you feel better and voice your reasons for this that seem commendable. Pharmacist comes along and give his "apparent" reasons for staying in a sig campaign.
Others come along and discuss your reasons you give for leaving a sig campaign and support those reasons. They then debunk BOGUS reasons for staying in a sig campaign offered by someone clearly presenting FALSE information.
Threads here are not for presenting false information to the reader. It is VALUABLE to the reader to have the observably FALSE information debunked or given the full context to make their own minds up.
This is the issue with " some" mods interpretation of permitted flow. They want to create and echo chamber that is usually based on the echos of FALSE and MISLEADING information and will REMOVE on topic, natural flow that presents CORRECT and TRUE information.
So I hope that has explained to you how CORRECTING false information on your thread and keeping it TRUE for the reader to digest is beneficial for you and the entire board.
False information that is on topic and related to the OP should be corrected. There is no other possible way of approaching it. So long as you do not bring in UNRELATED and OFF TOPIC examples to debunk the FALSE CLAIMS then of course the thread will naturally flow in the most optimal way.
Again well done for leaving paid2post. Your reasons are VALID. Those reasons offered as the personal reasons thepharmacist remains splashing chipmixer everywhere are debunked as UNTRUE or HIGHLY DOUBTFUL in light of the ontopic and relevant information presented.
You latest post " would join a campaign without minimal post requirements" is another good point. It is true without being forced to make up posting numbers to hit the payout level then that is certainly an improvement and perhaps something that the board should insist upon. This would cut out needless repetitive low value posting.
Pharmacist - to reply to you. You must refrain from making false accusations. That is our contention with you and any other person that continuously posts false and misleading information. That and supporting untrustworthy members. You will be corrected each time that we find you to be making false claims. These rebuttals will be on topic and relevant and highly valuable. It is good you are not posting the max just to increase chipmixer payments. Perhaps you have been improving recently. Keep to posting what you can demonstrate to be true and stop supporting untrustworthy members and improve further. Win win.
Quote
I don't know what campaign you were in since I have signatures blocked and never saw yours, and I just looked at your profile and you obviously removed your campaign signature--but what I was wondering was whether they had a minimum number of weekly posts or not. I've been in campaigns with minimum posts, and I always hated that unless it was a very low number.
But hey, props to you if it makes you feel more free. By the way, this might be better in Reputation or some other section.
Now, I doubt I will be any less active, but now I can purely post for fun without actually having to post.
If that's the case, why are you going campaign-free? The only reason I've been in signature campaigns was because I figured it'd be better to get paid for doing something I'd be doing anyway. It would be like leaving money on the table if I didn't take part in one.But hey, props to you if it makes you feel more free. By the way, this might be better in Reputation or some other section.
I've been in the Crypto-Games & Bitsler campaigns, they both had a 25 posts per week requirement.
Yeah, I totally get the "leaving money on the table" argument and that's why I'm still kinda leaving it open to join a campaign in the future.
Now it's just that I really do not have any external incentive to post, except pure interest, it just feels liberating in a way.
And wow, how did this turn into a rant against The Pharmacist, that really wasn't my intention.
I really didn't mean to shame people who were still active in signature campaigns, heck I have no moral qualms against people who are active in signature campaigns.
The posts I've seen The Pharmacist make were always on point, so I really don't agree with painting them in such a bad light.
Not every reply needs to be overly intellectual, sometimes people just enjoy to read regular stuff too...
I guess he left to be a bit more free, personally I'd give it a month and then you'd probably rejoin. I've had points where campaigns have closed thsa I'm in and I've just left for about a month for a break. It's quite nice every so often, I still stayed here and kept posting but it's just a bit different from being in a sig...
Hey, that could very well be the case, I do think I'd probably join a campaign without minimum post requirements.
OR
Maybe I'll just advertise a project that I'm really interested in and slap a referral link of my own on that.
I won't be making the same kind of money as in a regular Bitcoin signature campaign, but at least I'll have a warm fuzzy feeling
This thread has not turned into a rant against ANY person. It is simply how the permitted flow works. You say you left the sig campaign and say you feel better and voice your reasons for this that seem commendable. Pharmacist comes along and give his "apparent" reasons for staying in a sig campaign.
Others come along and discuss your reasons you give for leaving a sig campaign and support those reasons. They then debunk BOGUS reasons for staying in a sig campaign offered by someone clearly presenting FALSE information.
Threads here are not for presenting false information to the reader. It is VALUABLE to the reader to have the observably FALSE information debunked or given the full context to make their own minds up.
This is the issue with " some" mods interpretation of permitted flow. They want to create and echo chamber that is usually based on the echos of FALSE and MISLEADING information and will REMOVE on topic, natural flow that presents CORRECT and TRUE information.
So I hope that has explained to you how CORRECTING false information on your thread and keeping it TRUE for the reader to digest is beneficial for you and the entire board.
False information that is on topic and related to the OP should be corrected. There is no other possible way of approaching it. So long as you do not bring in UNRELATED and OFF TOPIC examples to debunk the FALSE CLAIMS then of course the thread will naturally flow in the most optimal way.
Again well done for leaving paid2post. Your reasons are VALID. Those reasons offered as the personal reasons thepharmacist remains splashing chipmixer everywhere are debunked as UNTRUE or HIGHLY DOUBTFUL in light of the ontopic and relevant information presented.
You latest post " would join a campaign without minimal post requirements" is another good point. It is true without being forced to make up posting numbers to hit the payout level then that is certainly an improvement and perhaps something that the board should insist upon. This would cut out needless repetitive low value posting.
Pharmacist - to reply to you. You must refrain from making false accusations. That is our contention with you and any other person that continuously posts false and misleading information. That and supporting untrustworthy members. You will be corrected each time that we find you to be making false claims. These rebuttals will be on topic and relevant and highly valuable. It is good you are not posting the max just to increase chipmixer payments. Perhaps you have been improving recently. Keep to posting what you can demonstrate to be true and stop supporting untrustworthy members and improve further. Win win.