Yeah, I deleted a few of your replies because I agreed that they were unsubstantial.
You did your job and I am not complaining about it at all. I had two reasons to create this topic:
1. I was curious to know the reasons given when reported.
2. Should a (some) very old post (posts) worth reporting unless it contains harmful contents like malware to download or phishing link etc (obviously both offense are ban worthy)
And while we discuss about these two points the other stuffs comes as side dish like possibility of ban for too many deleted posts by mods etc.
The answer for my question #1 is very straight forward which you and hilariousandco (^ post) confirmed and it's reasonable, and I am not complaining for any of it.
For the send one, obviously we will find mods will have different views and glad to know hilariousandco's (again ^) view about it. I agree with them here (bold emphasized):
I think it's not really necessary to report them either but people are free to report whatever they wish.
It would be if you had a chipmixer signature.
Or we both (Jet cash and me):-P
Please note - this award is not part of a conspiracy.
Conspirator will always find a topic for them to stay busy :-D