Nope.
I don't see any reason to change the title. "Shitcoin or Scamcoin" fits perfectly because it's either one of both. If it's "Scamcoin" I'm sorry for the investors but that's up to everyone when someone is investing in risky projects to make big money and I hope the Scamcoin devs will get caught and a fair punishment. If it's "Shitcoin" => same applies like for "Scamcoin" but the devs have still some benefit of doubt. I understand that Shitcoin business isn't easy to manage and I'm open to call any "Scamcoins" only "Shitcoins" if there's a random reason that it might be not a Scam.

But almost 95% of all coins are Shitcoins and they will die somewhere in the future. That's why new content in "Scam Accusation" is posted very frequently. 

And "Shitcoin" is not a defamation. It's an official term to describe a coin without (most of the) features a good cryptocurrency (like Bitcoin) is famous for. You should try to evaluate if a Coin is a Shitcoin or a Coin like - wait - a congressman.

Meanwhile, I'm going for Bitcoin and let's see which coin will have made a better return in 2 / 3 / 4 years. I guess your Shitcoin will have almost no value by then anymore compared to Bitcoin.