A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.
I don't think we should do that because some of the projects I know are where the CEO/COO just hire devs to create or work on the project. If they were shit devs then I don't think there wouldn't be investors at all because it will be seen as obvious scam from the start. And some shitcoins was a result of either a failed project or an exit scam.
The problem lies on the developer because several of them do this kind of work to earn money and accept more work to earn more money. I agree CEO/COO hires their developers but they must make sure that the developers their hired is solely focus on their project since these developers have a huge cut on the token and collected funds. But if a project become shitty, both CEO and the team are to be blame because they did not do their task well.