@TopTort777 As previously it's going to be Zwei
Good to see that your campaign is back. I am not sure if the requirements of campaign from your side, but seems require 10 post on gambling sections mandatory. Which might increase spam and you might get low quality post although this is the duty of manager for qualify post. Most of gambling sites require 5 post on gambling section and I think its appropriate. Or you might ask 6 but 10 really high in my opinion. All participant of your campaign doesn't mean they are gambler also. So its pretty much sure those are not much familiar with gambling they would spam here
I mostly agree with you
However, the majority of the signature campaigns you implicitly refer to here are asking users to make up to 25 posts weekly at max, so 5 posts in the gambling sections of the forum seems to be a totally justified and quite reasonable amount. On the other side of the dice, though, the new Wolf.bet campaign sets the max number of posts to 40 which is essentially the same ratio (well, it is still somewhat higher but you get the point). To sum it up, 8 posts a week in the Gambling section would be a good start and in line with other campaigns
Users that post frequently in the gambling sections shouldn't have any issues getting 10 posts in them. Really it will depend on what the manager counts as gambling sections. I try to cap it at 5 myself and give users freedom to post in other sections without having the minimum cap hanging over their heads, but all managers are different
But that largely depends on the campaign requirements
That is, what they are looking for. For instance, an exchange running a signature campaign may not be interested in the gambling sections at all (whichever count as such). On the other hand, casinos would rather go for all posts being made in these sections. So you would actually expect a casino to set a pretty high lower limit on the number of posts being contributed here (since that is their goal, to get as much exposure to gamblers as possible), and we can't blame them for such an attitude (well, unless it is a Stake.com signature campaign)
Regarding wolf.bet in particular, I'm rolling there myself and I like its look and feel, so it doesn't take me a lot to post about my
adventures there
So, you have to have money and a big budget at that to actually pull off a good signature campaign, if you quit after few weeks then you will just lose money without gaining much
Support this view myself. As a new kid on the block, they need publicity and that requires continual exposure for many months on end. If I remember correctly, the PrimeDice signature campaign had been running for something like a year (maybe, just a few months short of an entire year)