As always, first they yell scam/ponzi, give red trust, open flags.. all without having the necessary knowledge to understand the technical workflow of our business model or even 1 piece of evidence against us.
Then when they receive the answers, pooof. disappeared.
That's why "spineless".
Never bend the knees if you are running a legit business. Let the facts and your clients talk for your business and exploit the visibility that trolls give you.
Hopefully our story will teach something.
Then when they receive the answers, pooof. disappeared.
That's why "spineless".
Never bend the knees if you are running a legit business. Let the facts and your clients talk for your business and exploit the visibility that trolls give you.
Hopefully our story will teach something.
As has been pointed out to you several times already, you are a habitual liar incapable of honestly representing yourself and your services. Despite your massive arrogance and litany of unsubstantiated, over-the-top claims, you've only managed to actually demonstrate that you've made winning trades equaling to $11 across the span of 20 days. Had you made these trades for you clients they would currently be sitting on a loss, thanks to owing you 30% of their profits + a $10 a month "VPN fee".
Why are you charging every client this fee anyway? The more clients you have, the less the fee should be for each one.
Every time you speak you raise more questions than you can provide answers for.
Your one defender in this thread didn't even bother to oppose the flag against you. Shows you how much support you actually have here.
I don't see
Can anyone believe how ignorant a person can be ? What he's assuming is that 33 wins in a row and +15% would have been a losing investment which is totally false because we require at least 100$ as starting bankroll. That would have been 5$ profit considering the 10$ of monthly vps fee. But is not that the point. The point is that trading is all about %. And we wouldn't have even taken 5$ as commissions since is basically equal to a btc transaction fee. Our pay in a similar situation would be a new happy client that after a positive month of testing is ready to deposit a bigger bankroll.
I will just post the replies he already received.
Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific! 
Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born!
It would appear that themajority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable.
However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero.
Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born!
It would appear that the
However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero.
Buddy why you can't accept we are legit?
The profits are in term of ROI %. With 100$ in the account you will never get rich with 20% per month on avg.
The 100$ mark exists so the entry barrier is low, the people can test it and if they like it they deposit a real bankroll
The higher the bankroll, the higher the profit. Is simple math.
MarketMaking with 100$ is a joke even though still profitable thanks to compound, people with very low bankrolls should try our upcoming swing trading bot
Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific!
Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born!
It would appear that the majority of your trades were positive, so that is commendable.
However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero.
U have to think percentage wise lol. Anyway you are probably jealous and don' t know how his bot works and how Bitmex works.Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born!
It would appear that the majority of your trades were positive, so that is commendable.
However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero.
The only ones that are at loss are the people that go betting by clicking on your signature. THE BTC you get paid everyweek come from REKT people. SHAME. SHAME. SHAME.
We earn ONLY on people's profits. You earn on people's rekts.
We don't even take the commissions if the amount is insignificant
Yet you have the ass-face to fake interest in protecting the naive users. disgusting.