The Socrates system is full of ambiguities. Socrates provides no conclusion from the multitude of conflicting trading signals it provides:

See Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic

Talking about ambiguity, you can read there about a case where this moron Gumbi who is paid by Armstrong or is Armstrong himself advises to ignore the election of a reversal, elected within 1% rule, and then trade another reversal that was NOT elected. This is sheer madness.

Calling this an computer system is already a joke, because a computer system would know the rules and calculate the result from the multitude of conflicting signals.

This contraption looks more like a bunch of pocket calculators.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.