I will no longer continue participating in this comedy. I kept waiting for someone adequate who write a message, but apparently there is no such person here. I wish you all successful monetization in this thread, but without me.
PS:
And feel free to continue moving from one issue to another. We haven't seen many deflections recently in Reputation, so this is a beautiful banquet you're providing.
However, that one of "the most known users" still doesn't want to write without money. Surprise!
he only merits here as a silent partisan.
Here is the PM:
---------------------------------------------------
I would like to report about your signature spamming to your campaign manager. Give the link, please.
I Merited the post because a low-ranking user made a decent post. That doesn't even mean I have to agree with the post, it means I'm doing what Merit sources do.
As for the amount: it depends on how many sMerit I have left, so it varies.
If you do not read local topics, how can you say that I do not correctly distribute merit in local topics?
How can you consider a post worthy if you do not agree with it? Do you rate dignity by the number of letters used?
You do not understand or, most likely, pretend that you did not understand. At first: You gave 4 Merit to the troll and extortionist for his next deceitful post, and when I caught you on this, you deceitfully called it "a decent post". At second: I merited (1 merit) the user who called you two-faced, which I consider worthy of a warning about you that people need to know.
---------------------------------------------------
Easy money, LoyceV, only tonight
PS:
But free to give me orders at PM how many and to whom to distribute merit he is in no hurry))
Feel free to do as you like. If you want to send boatloads of merit to certain users, that's fine, but don't expect to be consequence-free.And feel free to continue moving from one issue to another. We haven't seen many deflections recently in Reputation, so this is a beautiful banquet you're providing.
However, that one of "the most known users" still doesn't want to write without money. Surprise!
he only merits here as a silent partisan.Here is the PM:
---------------------------------------------------
I would like to report about your signature spamming to your campaign manager. Give the link, please.
LoyceV, one of "the most known users", gave 4 merits to one of the most known Russian troll and extortioner https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183930
You seem to be mistaken about a few things. First: I neither know nor care about trolls on local boards: I don't read it.I Merited the post because a low-ranking user made a decent post. That doesn't even mean I have to agree with the post, it means I'm doing what Merit sources do.
As for the amount: it depends on how many sMerit I have left, so it varies.
If you do not read local topics, how can you say that I do not correctly distribute merit in local topics?
How can you consider a post worthy if you do not agree with it? Do you rate dignity by the number of letters used?
You do not understand or, most likely, pretend that you did not understand. At first: You gave 4 Merit to the troll and extortionist for his next deceitful post, and when I caught you on this, you deceitfully called it "a decent post". At second: I merited (1 merit) the user who called you two-faced, which I consider worthy of a warning about you that people need to know.
---------------------------------------------------
Easy money, LoyceV, only tonight