TOP-200 and chart on the first page have been updated again.
All non-banned members currently have at least 49345 sMerits available.
I also published monthly statistics for August 2019.
I think the best heading for the last column would be "accumulated sMerits" because this index represents how many additional sMerits a user has put into his/her own stash for a month. But the term "Earned sMerits" is also understandable.
I see that you earn merits and often send your sMerits as soon as possible. Obviously, you properly use the merit system. But this sorting algorithm is based solely on the difference between the sums of received and sent merits in accordance with the specified formula.
All non-banned members currently have at least 49345 sMerits available.
I also published monthly statistics for August 2019.
Wow, I see, but you are wrong too, at least you should edit the last column as left/ available smerits. That column does not present all smerits one user (in the list) earn each month.
I think the best heading for the last column would be "accumulated sMerits" because this index represents how many additional sMerits a user has put into his/her own stash for a month. But the term "Earned sMerits" is also understandable.
I am the user with most received merits AND most sent merits in the month.
I almost depleted my Merits stash.
I am in an anonymous 186th position, not at the top, not at the bottom on.
I think the sorting algorithm should be improved.
I almost depleted my Merits stash.
I am in an anonymous 186th position, not at the top, not at the bottom on.
I think the sorting algorithm should be improved.
I see that you earn merits and often send your sMerits as soon as possible. Obviously, you properly use the merit system. But this sorting algorithm is based solely on the difference between the sums of received and sent merits in accordance with the specified formula.