But why market without patents when the patents are far away? is that not a red flag? (large text because former post was large text 
)
but seriously starting marketing without a viable product is one of the biggest red flags in crypto. Im sure alot of people (outside of the echo chamber) will agree that being able to see the tech for themselves holds far more weight then "being told its good". Also another red flag is that testimonials are often done in MLM schemes....so.
Why not just get a secondary party that doesn't have a conflict of interest to review the tech?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134924.msg51675203#msg51675203 - 22 months btw
TLDR : I dont particularly care that xyz123 saw the tech. I want a reputable company to audit it with a proper through tested method and post the results while not breaking NDA. I dont want joe the gardener or jim the moonshine guy from the project to say "hey! this is good you should invest!" I want someone without a conflict of interest.
)but seriously starting marketing without a viable product is one of the biggest red flags in crypto. Im sure alot of people (outside of the echo chamber) will agree that being able to see the tech for themselves holds far more weight then "being told its good". Also another red flag is that testimonials are often done in MLM schemes....so.
Why not just get a secondary party that doesn't have a conflict of interest to review the tech?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134924.msg51675203#msg51675203 - 22 months btw
TLDR : I dont particularly care that xyz123 saw the tech. I want a reputable company to audit it with a proper through tested method and post the results while not breaking NDA. I dont want joe the gardener or jim the moonshine guy from the project to say "hey! this is good you should invest!" I want someone without a conflict of interest.