The words he used were "concrete red flags" ie something solid and observable beyond mere suspicion. You are free to have your own opinions,you are not free to have your own facts and rules. No matter how abhorrent you think I am, I am still not part of a collectivist hive mind that punishes anyone of a different mind. I am just one individual that upholds principles no matter who they apply to. Its easy to feel right with a dozen of your friends ready to dogpile on anyone who challenges you. This is all that is wrong with the current default trust as it stands. Feel free to find some more friends to reassure you of your correctitude in your arbitrary witch hunts.
It is very observable that CryptoSparks
asked for a 5 BTC loan and said it's risk-free.
You don't uphold any "principles", you're just making shit up when you're unable to get someone to agree with you. You can't be possibly dumb enough to believe that your incessant yapping about your virtuous character means anything to anybody except yourself.
If the partnership request to lenders is the real problem, why didn't you all attacked that at first? Why do i have all kind of illogical feedback?
Why can't you understand that the "risk free" is referred to us taking the market risk while giving fixed interest to the lender that would have still access the funds?
I guess the answer is... you got roasted on every other aspect, and in your case little shiba, because of huge lack of technical knowledge. much wow!
I also find very funny how most of you guys, and ladies, start your accusation with something like:
I don't know anything about trading bots, but this looks pretty fishy to me and it does indeed look as though he's a scammer. I'll support the flag in lieu of giving this guy a neg, which he already has a bunch of.
Just an advice, if you don't know anything about a subject, don't pretend to know better than who works in that field.
You can have your opinion that "is impossible to make money with bots and markets", but that is just..
your personal opinion. Your pointless flag states:Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with CryptoSparks is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so.
This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.Is clear that the bold part is totally untrue, since you have 0 concrete evidence against us and all your accusations are based on personal opinions and lack of knowledge.
Also stop with the " is hard to find evidence" theory. Is very easy to spot a scam and prove it. The fact you have nothing against us even though you have access to the live demo account via
api key (
special link for suchdumbmoon and smallbrainers )should make you think.
Objective proof of fraud isn't needed for a type 1 flag.
Where is the "concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions. " ?
Why there are knowledgeable & reasonable forum users that don't agree with it?
Funny how you pop out only now that a few of your pathetic internet police buddies came out of their dirty holes, don't you have casinos to spam? did you get your weekly payout based on the rekts that you bring to sportsbet?