No, its evidence that anyone dealing with you as at high risk of losing money.
If this is your arbitrary standard, then you best get to work tagging every single gambling, betting, casino,and ponzi among others. Of course you don't do that you just arbitrarily pick people to enforce these subjective standards upon. The flags are there to help prevent fraud, not to prevent people from taking risks.
what guarantees you want in trading other than a long term backtested strategy with safe money management? 500% in 20 months is safe and slow.
No, its not. And you have no proof of this. Your "backtest data" is garbage as far as the real world is concerned.
What guarantees you will wake up tomorrow? Again, you are enforcing a standard of guilty until proven innocent. If people want to trust random people on the internet to trade for them that is their prerogative regardless of how unappealing you personally find the offer.
I understand you think everybody should take your word as 100% true.
But everyone should trust your assumptions as being 100% true?
Again, I understand you think everybody should be taking your word at face value, which is hard to do given that you have a propensity to lie and exaggerate.
He is at least presenting SOME evidence to support his position, you on the other hand are exaggerating and lying in order to justify your arbitrary inquisitions.
OMG. You are unable to admit your record has losing trades, despite the evidence being clearly there.
Now every single trade needs to be a winner in order for this bot to be profitable? Have you ever even traded manually let alone using a bot?
If its a "winning trade" then why does it yield a negative return?
Are you sure you are not reading the log in reverse?
There's a clear difference between "a profit" and "constant profits." You don't even know that you can generate constant profits. Whatever works for you this month might not even work the next. Like I told you, you can point to your backtest data all you want and people can decide for themselves if they want to trust your word or not. Regardless, it comes down to a matter of trust, and absolutely nothing more.
This same standard could literally be applied to literally any tradings service. If people can decide for themselves who the fuck are you running around trying to tell people they shouldn't trade with him by plastering his reputation with arbitrary tags?
Successful traders don't use bots. The best way to become a successful trader is, doing less trades.
The less you trade, the more successful you become.
That's why, the best traders are who do zero trades, hodlers.
Again, clearly not the same thing as saying "impossible."
Thanks for proving you are a moron with no trading experience mindrust. Maybe leave the criticism to people who have experience with what they are talking about. No you aren't saying it is impossible to profit using a trading bot,you are just saying it is impossible your accusations and suspicions based on nothing are wrong.
This is an idiotic, overly dramatic and non-applicable comparison. Nobody put you in prison, jackass. We're just trying to warn others that you are exhibiting untrustworthy behavior that has more in common with scammers than people offering legitimate services.
I'm thoroughly bored now of you arguing in circles with me and am not giving you any more free exposure.
Have a terrific day.
Is that anything like your an idiotic, overly dramatic and non-applicable comparison of this legitimate but potentially (maybe) risky service to fraud? You aren't just warning people, just creating a thread would be just warning people. You and your cult buddies are arbitrating who does and does not get to have a reputation based on your suspicions alone.