Og was making a claim of extortion (which typically involves money)... the thread he linked, which I admittedly don't remember seeing at the time (or ignored as more useless bickering), was some sort of nonsense public "settlement" about leaving the forum and getting their accounts banned. I don't care what Og or others pay in taxes and do not want his tax number . I believe one should pay taxes, but I also believe the government takes too much (then uses it inappropriately).. so I can't take issue with trying to legally minimize the amount that is taken away.

I stated in my prior post that I'm ignoring both Vod's and OgNasty's statements that do not present any evidence. The one time I did question Vod about the content to one of Og's chopped up PMs, he provided additional context/evidence which showed more of the conversation and IMO showed Og to be misrepresenting the truth. I've already explained this. Og hasn't provided anything but generalized comments which are basically saying things along the lines of "the full context won't make this any better for Vod".. but then he won't provide them?

I'm not saying I agree with the snarky comment that Og spun into some sort of demand for merit and abusing his position as a merit source, but Og seems to be intently trying to deceive to smear someone in this thread and it appears pretty vindictive to me.


I do not condone violent behavior.. including a few posts ago when you were making your own thinly veiled threat.. to someone who hasn't even been determined to be a scammer.

...