Re: [ANN] Freelanex : Where the Blockchain Meets the Freelancer's Needs [IEO SOON]
Do you really think that the freelance market is able to make a profit?
Any market in which people sell their services is able to make money. The team of this project expects to take the position of intermediaries between freelancers and employers. Mediation is also a business.
There have already been many projects with the same theme and purpose. But all of them eventually failed and brought people losses. I am interested in why this project is better than all its predecessors.
I have seen less than 5 projects comes blockchain technology, and yes most of the projects failed, I don't know the reasons exactly why. probably they are having issues with their idea or issues with their background. It doesn't mean that we will not able to bring our idea to reality. we are doing everything to make this project success
Do you dont know the reasons why these projects have failed? I understand correctly that you did not conduct any market research, but just came and expressed your desire to try to realize the idea? This is the very approach that made your predecessors fail. It's irresponsible.
You came into the business without even thinking about the problems of this business, and even more so without thinking about how you can become better than everyone else.
I do not think that your project will be profitable for investors. Your approach is irresponsible.
Do you really think that the freelance market is able to make a profit?
Any market in which people sell their services is able to make money. The team of this project expects to take the position of intermediaries between freelancers and employers. Mediation is also a business.
There have already been many projects with the same theme and purpose. But all of them eventually failed and brought people losses. I am interested in why this project is better than all its predecessors.
I understand your concern. But if this idea was not implemented by someone else in the past, it does not mean that it can not be implemented in principle.
Yes. You're right. But your point of view will be correct only if other teams "do work on mistakes", studying the mistakes of predecessors, and not just barge into the market with another ill-conceived proposal. Here, apparently, it is such a case.
This project will be a failure. It is no different from the already failed attempts made by other teams.
I would not advise anyone to invest in this project. But everyone should make their own conclusions and decisions.