Korvas: face some facts, old chap. Ionomy isnt ever going to be a successful project, despite pivoting more than an Olympic gymnast. Your recent vote on what is supposedly the most significant change to the very foundation of this coin amassed an astonishing ~90 votes. For all your criticism of Sharkies lack of support (and well come to that later), you hardly have a leg to stand on here. Over 3 years worth of toil and you have 90 investors/supporters who care enough to vote. And even thats being generous and assuming that owners of multiple masternodes havent voted more than once (and lets face it, they probably have).
You must be so proud.
This is a project crammed with incredibly, impenetrably niche ideas and inconsistent, ever changing implementation. Its never going to amass broad interest, amongst gamers or the indie devs youre apparently so keen to assume will be gagging for it. Its ultimately going nowhere regardless of how many tokens you add or take away.
I think you are on the right track with a good analyst of what the ionomy 2019 has become.
For years now, Mr. Matlack's dream has been a moving window which they lag 7 months to a year in getting the product to the investor. His methodology to implement new ION functionality from a bottom-up approach. Keep gluing on piece after piece trying to achieve Mr. Matlack's dream. This dream is no where near the professional ION investor vision.
This what you call a honest vote when
trying to ram-rod the most significant change to the very foundation of this coin. LISTEN to your professional ION investors and spur the ecosystem with an increase in Block reward. Ionomy sucess will start by
using good business practices and register Ionomy collateral resources. Mr. Matlack have you tried setting milestones for the ION project and trying to achieve them ON TIME

WILD Innovative ION Network Plan
ION Master Node[10K IONsx] + ION Smart Node[500 Atoms] + All ION Staking Wallets = 18 IONs Block Reward
Plan 8 Details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg50248724#msg50248724
No official confirmation yet but it looks like the community/investors have overwhelmingly voted to support IIP 006.
Think about it. A couple of days ago the vote was something like YES 81 NO 1. Why would someone who wanted to vote YES need to vote when it was always 99% on track for a YES result.
community lol.. The plan is done now that Mr. Koras has declared it...
The joke is Who is actually wants to use this worthless functionality

Where is the investor market of supporters
