Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Quote
Fast forward 3 yrs 7 months.......... The project is still not dead in the water, in fact, quite the opposite. Trying to save XPY exposed them to the shower of shit that was the XPY dev team. When XPY was dropped they could have made a clean break as the only connection to Garza/XPY was they were just customers but they didn't. Even though it meant a ton of abuse they offered their XPY.io customers a transition from XPY to ION and we all know how that turned out 
... for those that transitioned it was:
very very very well = sold at $8
very very well = sold at $5
very well = sold at $2
well = sold at $1
Today you are lucky as you now have a second chance. The question is will you repeat the past or will you learn from it
... for those that transitioned it was: very very very well = sold at $8
very very well = sold at $5
very well = sold at $2
well = sold at $1
Today you are lucky as you now have a second chance. The question is will you repeat the past or will you learn from it
I couldnt have asked for a more amusing response. Things must be bad in the depths of the Ionomy investor community if youre honestly trying to tap me up to invest.
Obviously Im not going to invest, Im not that stupid. Everything I said back then still stands, though Ill admit that I grossly underestimated the fact that such a small bunch of saps would be willing to prop this up for so long.
The underlying issue is that this team achieved nothing of note with xpy.io, and similarly theyve achieved nothing of note with Ionomy. If you disagree with that, perhaps you can point to some evidence to the contrary - maybe you can show off some dazzling stats about their user base growth, or some revenue projections, for example. As youve said, youre several years in here, so surely theyve shared some of these by now?
Ultimately, all I can see here is exactly what I saw in the beginning, which is a team thats produced a bunch of vague solutions with no problems to actually solve. Their longevity proves nothing because there is no other markers of success to go alongside it.
Quote
Obviously Im not going to invest, Im not that stupid. Everything I said back then still stands, though Ill admit that I grossly underestimated the fact that such a small bunch of saps would be willing to prop this up for so long.
very very very well = sold at $8 x 5,000 = $40,000 = min profit of $39,000
very very well = sold at $5 x 5,000 = $25,000 = min profit of $24,000
very well = sold at $2 x 5,000 = $10,000 = min profit of $9,000
well = sold at $1 x 5,000 = $5,000 = min profit of $4,000
Min profit = I didn't factor in any ION you may a got from staking
Your assessment sucked then, your assessment still sucks today although if you have an allergic reaction to profit your still very much on track.
Quote
The underlying issue is that this team achieved nothing of note with xpy.io, and similarly theyve achieved nothing of note with Ionomy. If you disagree with that, perhaps you can point to some evidence to the contrary - maybe you can show off some dazzling stats about their user base growth, or some revenue projections, for example. As youve said, youre several years in here, so surely theyve shared some of these by now?
Quote
Ultimately, all I can see here is exactly what I saw in the beginning, which is a team thats produced a bunch of vague solutions with no problems to actually solve. Their longevity proves nothing because there is no other markers of success to go alongside it.