I really wonder what you're trying to do here dude. 3 posts in a row, all with constant FUD against a project that has delivered on a TON of their promises so far. It seems like you're a guy who bought in at the peak, and now blames the devs for your own actions.
I COULD BE WRONG, but it just seems like it. These guys are working on products that has never been coded before. Lightning as an example is on constant development on it's own, and yet you think a lightning wallet is coded in a couple of weeks? Do you even have any IDEA of how many things could go wrong if they released a wallet to the public without testing it enough?
I've had my fair experience coding in C++ and VB, and honestly? It wasn't really my thing. I hate people like you who have no freaking IDEA what it takes to code something like this from scratch.
The wallet has been finished long ago, "finished" as the community kept on bugging the team asking for it, asking for updates. Devs has been upfront all the time, shared pictures, and now opened for the final round of testing before public release. I need to type finished in quotation marks since nothing isn't really 100% finished until it's been fully tested for exploits, bugs, spelling mistakes, UI mistakes, integration errors and the list goes on and on.
Look around you, I can name LOADS of projects who hasn't achieved even 50% of what Stakenet has, and that's when looking at projects sitting on the front page of Coinmarketcap.
Stop complaining, take a chill pill and either step off your high horse, or get lost. You're really annoying, and your attitude is extremely rude.
aha which TON did they deliver then? not wanna discuss how 100% means finished for every normal person in the world and not beta, but since it was "finished" in may, i would presume that testing could be finished by now. how you come to the opinion that i dont know coding is not really explained, but ok, i hope you won't tell the company i programmed some call-for-bids and cost monitoring software for. anyway, maybe you should take a realist look on what was promised when - especially in the anns - and think about from where the critic stems.
how someone, who knows more about my programing skills than me and my employers, "hates" people like me, gives commands, and thinks that he has the authority to tell someone to get off a project, thinks that the other person is rude and on the high horse, should tell you a lot about the real given situation. the answer to nothing getting delivered for quite some time are ad hominems...