Surprising to see this.

For a user claiming to be the owner/operator of an exchange, why on earth would anybody in that position sign up to the cryptotalk signature campaign instead of spreading the word for their own exchange? I always thought there was something not right about that exchange.

It is important for users to know who to take to court and who to serve litigation documents if/when any scamming takes place so until they add contact and ownership details on their website, I would advise all to stay well away from this exchange and all others like it that hide behind anonymity and secrecy themselves but can ask users for KYC under the guise of AML laws when they like.

https://www.unnamed.exchange/Home/Terms