This was very alarming, after all these years of giving vaccin to the young children just make the situation even worse. If this was true, why they are doing it?
It's amazingly profitable to get 80% of a population taking prescription drugs, particularly when there is no limit to what can be charged for many of them thanks to the magic of lobbying.
Is it for money?
Not completely. There are other deeper philosophical reason involved. Ask almost anyone if they think planet earth (aka, 'mother gaia') has an overpopulation (of humans) problem and they'll say 'yes', but it's especially the case for those having dynastic wealth. The money part is the primary component which lubricates all of the moving parts of the whole process though. The fact overpopulation is a quasi-religious issue for those who happen to have control of the money supply is why the vaccine 'loss leader' has such traction.
So that if these children have an illness they will bring to the hospital? Based on what i know human body had already something that fights bacteria but in some cases it cannot be best done witb the help of other medicine and technologies.
Sure. Most of these illnesses had dropped to very low numbers before the vaccine was even introduced. Not only that but getting something like measles and staying home from school for a few days confers life-long immunity which is passed to a breastfeeding infant in their first year while they are vulnerable. Vaccines 'immunity' gives neither of these features and as a result the natural ecology of these mild right-of-passage ailments (chicken-pox, mumps, measles, rubella, etc) has become totally messed up.
Any 'scientist' or 'doctor' with a few hours to kill can understand these phenomenon. It looks to me as though what Joe Sixpack considers a problem (e.g., a life-long debilitating medical condition) is not considered as such by TPTB. In other words, the autoimmune conditions that vaccines create "is not a bug; it's a feature."