This thread was made prior to the new rule, and yes this entire thread is littered with fake/shill accounts by the team themselves. If a thread has no users interacting with it, it does not yield to a "good public vision" therefore, puppets didn't and will not go away with the new rule, due to the effects of "having a community."
Every aspect of this project yields itself to be a scam, from every written piece of content to how it's marketed and structured. I personally will not spend my time going point-by-point into every red-flag this project throws, despite the previous shill explaining what it means
A scam in crypto does not necessarily have to have an ICO, IEO or have an initial backing. Scam coins exists in all shapes, forms and aspects, ERC-20 tokens by the factor of having any value or worth, can lead into a scam project.
Documents, notarized docs can be forged, faked and manipulated if you have the proper contacts and resources available. By this thread even being on Bitcointalk also lends itself to target the average investor and user here, which is a coincidence when dealing with any significant amount of gold, which would be more attractive outside of the conventional crypto grounds.
I had my fair share of doubts when I saw the announcement and bounty thread as well. I even
commented the same.
I joined the project bounty despite having my doubts.
I got paid, tried their instant exchange, easily converted gold tokens to ethereum.
Gold token supply reflects amount of gold stored in BullionStar wallet, which is (
verifiable.
^ but this might not matter to you as you say it can be forged.
Exchanges, in last few days they have already announced two exchange listings. If it were a scam project, I doubt they would be spending any money on exchanges.
One thing is, I didn't find security audit on chainsecurity's website so I have e-mailed them regarding the same, hopefully, I shall get reply soon, will update the same here.
This guy is probably running the show fyi or directly involved:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=360915, who's merited this thread and was the only merit he's ever sent in his life. Merits don't come out of nowhere or from "generous souls," who are not directly involved in the system of awarding or distributing merit to people on active basis.
That man had joined the bounty and might have liked the project hence given the merit.
Which scammer would be stupid enough to merit his own Ann with negative trust account?
Someone accused razorglass of being thief, and later he got removed from bounty. You can check the convo here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5164058.msg52065919#msg52065919I would like to see your arguments with sufficient proof backing it (other similar projects have been scam, so this one is ought to be so, this is not valid.)