I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here
I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.
Yea,saw that on medium, so i think bitmax is just trying to stay safe, i mean they must have worked hard to gain such reputation and are not in the mood to step down in order to let go the wrongs of anyone, even though deepcloud was once their client and like the saying goes, customers are king but this is a situation that has to deal with financial products, so its tough