Re: 🔵🔵🔵 [ANN] BitMax.io Transaction Mining & Reverse-Mining ⚡️⚡️⚡️

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

I'll suggest that deepcloud should channel their efforts in searching for more partnerships and listing of their tokens in other exchange platform. I just feel there's no point crying over a spilled milk, since the delisting has been made. If they wanted to make amends it should be before the project was delisted. Now that the worst has been done, let them find a way to move on.
[/quote

You made a good point, no doubt. I suppose you don't believe that the project could be listed again after been delisted. I personally haven't heard of a project that was delisted from an exchange and later relisted. So it's best for deepcloud to work with other exchanges and strive to avoid issues like this. I believe they must have learnt their lessons with this event.