Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
It must be embarrassing for Blue Hill Mining not being legal and therefore not able to sell their scam token to the very countries they are claiming to be regulated in (FINMA) or trying (Toronto, US).
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Dear Community:
Regarding the question made above, this is our answer.
Blue Hill Mining is a totally legal project and yet so, it's not a scam. We have never claimed to be regulated neither in Netherlads, Canada or USA. As you should know, each country that you have named has its own regulation. We are beggining the regulation process as you can easily read in our roadmap, and as far we are not intending to be regulated in those countries in this stage.
In order to be able to sell to those countries, we must apply and get each country's regulation; and once this is done we would be able to get into those markets. Right now that's not part of our plan, so that's why we don't have any reason at all of why these people could and should acquire our tokens; as we don't have these countries included neither in our selling plan or our regulation plan for the Q4-2019.
Feel free to ask whatever else you may doubt.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
You lie bluehillfoundation.sup. You said they were registered:
B.H.Mining-STO
The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security
Token Offering that owns 30% of the Blue Hill Mine as
well as 30% of the Blue Hill Platform.
The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security
Token Offering that owns 30% of the Blue Hill Mine as
well as 30% of the Blue Hill Platform.
The community still awaits your response to this unforgivable, misleading statement that encouraged investors who wouldn’t otherwise invest unless the FINMA were backing this project. Please explain to the community why you stated this LIE.
While you are carefully thinking about your response you can also explain why the Blue Hill Mining whitepaper states that it is a FULLY REGULATED STO when in fact it IS NOT.
Blue Hill Mining whitepaper, version 6.3 (https://www.bluehillmining.com/docs/whitepaper.pdf)
Next time before you LIE, stating “We have never claimed to be regulated neither in Netherlads, Canada or USA” you should remember what you had previously stated and read the whitepaper first. This is embarrassing for Blue Hill Mining, and for you.
Apparently the proceeds are going to fund the FINMA license where you are not allowed to buy the token. Caught you out again.
Let’s review your direct lies. You say “The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security”, the whitepaper says it’s “a FULLY REGULATED STO”, and since the FINMA/International warning against Blue Hill Mining you have changed your mind because you were caught. It is in black and white, a direct quote from you and the whitepaper LYING to the community.
RED FLAG!
“In order to be able to sell to those countries, we must apply and get each country's regulation; and once this is done we would be able to get into those markets. Right now that's not part of our plan, so that's why we don't have any reason at all of why these people could and should acquire our tokens; as we don't have these countries included neither in our selling plan or our regulation plan for the Q4-2019”.
Yes, in order to sell the token to people in those countries they must be regulated before the sale of the token. HOWEVER, you have already STARTED to sell the token, and not a single country has it regulated, so it’s ILLEGAL.
RED FLAG!
Why are you saying “Right now that's not part of our plan, so that's why we don't have any reason at all of why these people could and should acquire our tokens; as we don't have these countries included neither in our selling plan or our regulation plan for the Q4-2019”
Remember you have already STARTED to sell the token. The argument here is you have already illegally sold the token under false pretences, not if you have applied for regulation.
Because "Blue Hill Foundation" is founded in the Netherlands it is already governed by the FINMA, you seem to be forgetting this.
It is part of the plan to be regulated with the FINMA and the SEC and in Toronto.
Here is your Roadmap.
RED FLAGS!
SCAM
Dear Community
As a final answer to this thread (having concluded the Blue Hill Foundation stage for the Blue Hill Mining STO) and thanking you all for your inquires and participation, we leave this previous list made up by a user with some topics to clarify, in order to give more light upon the queries highlited about BHF.
8. Blue Hill Mining relationship with Bayajtatu
It’s true that you cannot see see the name “Blue Hill Foundation” but you can easily read in our Terms and Conditions and also look into our backoffice, where there is a link which shows that Rebus Corporation is 24% co-owner of Bauajtatu LLC. Rebus Corporation is a company belonging to Blue Hill Foundation, the main company behind the Blue Hill Mining Project, so; it’s logical to say that the brand is 24% co-owner, as there is a huge world known difference between a brand and a company in legal name. You can check this difference in thousands of companies around the world in all the industries.
As a final answer to this thread (having concluded the Blue Hill Foundation stage for the Blue Hill Mining STO) and thanking you all for your inquires and participation, we leave this previous list made up by a user with some topics to clarify, in order to give more light upon the queries highlited about BHF.
8. Blue Hill Mining relationship with Bayajtatu
It’s true that you cannot see see the name “Blue Hill Foundation” but you can easily read in our Terms and Conditions and also look into our backoffice, where there is a link which shows that Rebus Corporation is 24% co-owner of Bauajtatu LLC. Rebus Corporation is a company belonging to Blue Hill Foundation, the main company behind the Blue Hill Mining Project, so; it’s logical to say that the brand is 24% co-owner, as there is a huge world known difference between a brand and a company in legal name. You can check this difference in thousands of companies around the world in all the industries.
I just need to fully understand from you bluehillfoundation.sup what you are saying above. This is very important bluehillfoundation.sup, the information you provide must be UP-TO-DATE, ie. current. Please be clear for the community with my below question.
You say Rebus Corporation is a company that Blue Hill Foundation own, whom as to date own 24% of Bauajtatu LLC? To-date means as of right now, today.
yes or no? feel free to expand your answer.
Dear Community:
Regarding the question made above, this is our answer.
Yes, Rebus Corporation BV, owns today 24% of Bayatatu LLC, this can be see via the government link to the state registration. Rebus Corporation is a Blue Hill Foundation Company since the beggining of the project.
Feel free to ask whatever else you may doubt.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
Yes, you should have thanked me for pointing this information so you could then change things.
https://imgur.com/a/RRcZ8H9
I have already discussed this extensively but open up this dialogue. Feel free to explain the following:
Stichting Administratiekantoor Rebus Enterprise, KvK 67031242 is closed for business
Rebus Enterprise B.V., KvK 67043984 is closed for business.
Rebus Enterprise B.V., KvK 69259151 is closed for business
Rebus Holding B.V., Kvk 68370237 is closed for business
Rebus Holding B.V., Kvk 69259151 is closed for business
Rebus Kvk 17138240 is closed for business
Rebus B.V., Kvk 22052168 is closed for business
Rebus B.V., Kvk 17168281 is closed for business
Stichting Rebus, Kvk 41188170 is closed for business.
https://www.kvk.nl
You will also need to prove that “Stichting Administratiekantoor Rebus Enterprise,” has a “brand” called Blue Hill Mining. You have changed you tact because you have been caught.
So far you have been caught out with your lies. The whitepaper says the “Blue Hill Foundation is a Netherlands based foundation (Stichting) that already owns 24% of the Blue Hill Mining exploration project…”.
So apparently now, Blue Hill Foundation is called Stichting Administratiekantoor Rebus Enterprise and the Blue Hill Mining exploration is now called Bayajtatu LLC. These are just recent changes otherwise the business structure doesn’t match you now claim.
RED FLAG!
The whitepaper refers to the company as being Blue Hill Mining Corporation AG (Swiss Public Limited Company). This means the company is already regulated being a public Limited company. But that was a LIE, it is not. Company NOT found.
RED FLAG!
It has already been disproven that Rebus Corporation is owned by Blue Hill Foundation. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152373.40). In fact this business model is NOT consistent with the Blue Hill Mining white-papers as discussed in the thread.
Ive been expecting this change in tactic since there is no logical explanation on why Blue Hill Foundation/Mining is NOT found on any company register. In fact I have pre-emted this.
What a shame the white-paper was specific about company names.
I bet you don’t even know what a Swiss AG means LOL guess you don’t. These are all specific to the Netherlands jurisdiction - that the FINMA oversee.
Apparently the proceeds are going to fund the FINMA license where you are not allowed to buy the token. Got it.
RED FLAG!
Allow me to give you a reason on why people from the following areas cannot buy into this SCAM. Alarming RED FLAGS in the whitepaper under “Terms and Conditions”.
https://www.bluehillfoundation.com/docs/terms-conditions.pdf
Quote: “Due to legal and regulatory uncertainty in the United States of America, citizens and green card holders of…are prohibited from making contributions to Blue Hill Foundation and participating in the Token Sale”.
Quote: “Canadian citizens and person’s resident in and/or domiciled in Canada are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale”.
Quote: “Dutch citizens and person’s resident in and/or domiciled in the Netherlands are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale”.
Quote: “Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from Japan are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale”.
Quote: “Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from the Republic of Korea are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale”.
Why are these RED FLAGS?
Because you claim to ALREADY be regulated in the Netherlands (FINMA), want to be regulated in the US (SEC) and also Toronto (Canada) HOWEVER, no-one in these countries are allowed to purchase tokens. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
You then claimed that you did not state this but WRONG, another LIE.
It is part of the plan to be regulated with the FINMA and the SEC and in Toronto.
Here is your Roadmap.
RED FLAGS!
Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM, Blue Hill Mining is an embarrassment to other SCAMMERS because they can’t get their story straight. This is the worse SCAM I have ever seen put together. Amateurs. Scammers.
SCAM
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]