Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Blue Hill Foundation\Mining- Blue Hill Mine - STO - SCAM WARNING
by
Crypto-Info
on 12/10/2019, 01:29:15 UTC
Dear Community
As a final answer to this thread (having concluded the Blue Hill Foundation stage for the Blue Hill Mining STO) and thanking you all for your inquires and participation, we leave this previous list made up by a user with some topics to clarify, in order to give more light upon the queries highlited about BHF.


8. Blue Hill Mining relationship with Bayajtatu
It’s true that you cannot see see the name “Blue Hill Foundation” but you can easily read in our Terms and Conditions and also look into our backoffice, where there is a link which shows that Rebus Corporation is 24% co-owner of Bauajtatu LLC. Rebus Corporation is a company belonging to Blue Hill Foundation, the main company behind the Blue Hill Mining Project, so; it’s logical to say that the brand is 24% co-owner, as there is a huge world known difference between a brand and a company in legal name. You can check this difference in thousands of companies around the world in all the industries.



 I just need to fully understand from you bluehillfoundation.sup what you are saying above. This is very important bluehillfoundation.sup, the information you provide must be UP-TO-DATE, ie. current. Please be clear for the community with my below question.

You say Rebus Corporation is a company that  Blue Hill Foundation own, whom as to date own 24% of Bauajtatu LLC? To-date means as of right now, today.

yes or no? feel free to expand your answer.


Dear Community:

Regarding the question made above, this is our answer.
Yes, Rebus Corporation BV, owns today 24% of Bayatatu LLC, this can be see via the government link to the state registration. Rebus Corporation is a Blue Hill Foundation Company since the beggining of the project.
Feel free to ask whatever else you may doubt.

Cordially greetings

Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department


Yes, you should have thanked me for pointing this information so you could then change things.




https://imgur.com/a/RRcZ8H9


I have already discussed this extensively but open up this dialogue. Feel free to explain the following:



Stichting Administratiekantoor Rebus Enterprise, KvK 67031242 is closed for business
Rebus Enterprise B.V., KvK 67043984 is closed for business.
Rebus Enterprise B.V., KvK 69259151 is closed for business
Rebus Holding B.V., Kvk 68370237 is closed for business
Rebus Holding B.V., Kvk 69259151 is closed for business
Rebus Kvk 17138240 is closed for business
Rebus B.V., Kvk 22052168 is closed for business
Rebus B.V., Kvk 17168281 is closed for business
Stichting Rebus, Kvk 41188170 is closed for business.


https://www.kvk.nl


You will also need to prove that “Stichting Administratiekantoor Rebus Enterprise,” has a “brand” called Blue Hill Mining. You have changed you tact because you have been caught.

So far you have been caught out with your lies. The whitepaper says the “Blue Hill Foundation is a Netherlands based foundation (Stichting) that already owns 24% of the Blue Hill Mining exploration project…”.


So apparently now, Blue Hill Foundation is called Stichting Administratiekantoor Rebus Enterprise and the Blue Hill Mining exploration is now called Bayajtatu LLC. These are just recent changes otherwise the business structure doesn’t match you now claim.


RED FLAG!




The whitepaper refers to the company as being Blue Hill Mining Corporation AG (Swiss Public Limited Company). This means the company is already regulated being a public Limited company. But that was a LIE, it is not. Company NOT found.


RED FLAG!

It has already been disproven that Rebus Corporation is owned by Blue Hill Foundation. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152373.40). In fact this business model is NOT consistent with the Blue Hill Mining white-papers as discussed in the thread.

Ive been expecting this change in tactic since there is no logical explanation on why Blue Hill Foundation/Mining is NOT found on any company register. In fact I have pre-emted this.

What a shame the white-paper was specific about company names.

I bet you don’t even know what a Swiss AG means LOL guess you don’t. These are all specific to the Netherlands jurisdiction - that the FINMA oversee.





Apparently the proceeds are going to fund the FINMA license where you are not allowed to buy the token. Got it. Opposite to what you said.

RED FLAG!