That's a 100% bogus argument since "Satoshi" in his own words mentions absolutely nothing about outsourcing scaling of Bitcoin to private corporation called Blockstream and using their permissioned ledger called Lightning Network that's an exact replica of the already existing banking system.  If you were actually honest and not a crooked shitlib/digital shitcoin scammer, you would likely classify LN as a hijacking of Bitcoin and not altering the block size, which Satoshi actually did talk about.

Which scaling method is better (both suck, all digital shitcoins are scams, and only physical metals are money) is irrelevant.  One method clearly adheres to the original project much more than the other.  As an impartial judge, it would be very difficult to claim LN is not a hijacking of Bitcoin.  Your only real course of action is to whine that Satoshi left the project for dead.  Have you ever considered it's abandoned because it's designed to centralize, inferior to physical metals, and not even possible to create a decentralized digital currency in the first place?