Pretending to fight scams and using it as cover to attack your opponents and competitors is quite useful and profitable, just look at the BitCops on the default trust. Defy them and they will use their authority at any opportunity to serve their own personal interests, be it for profit, protecting their pals, or soothing butthurt. Much like game-protect, if you refuse to get on your knees and suck they will make an example out of you to send a message to everyone else to comply.
So now you've taken to defending a proven scammer and the least trusted member on the forum in order to carry on your ageless vendetta against the DT system... Classy.
Where did I defend game-protect? Please quote.
Now you're even starting to sound like him. For starters, you're inferring that we asked him to suck our collective dick, and because he didn't, we "made an example out of him." You're inferring that his problem isn't his but that of the DTs. That's just fucking stupid man. Get a grip.
I simply pointed out his racket is not unique and also one used by many occupying the default trust.
His racket is unique. He's the only one going around shitting on everything casino-related in hopes of luring new victims to prey on. Its an incredibly shitty business model, and nobody on the default trust list does the same thing. Oh but of course that's not what you said, you said something entirely different, and I'm sure you're going to educate us all on it right now.
Corrupt people can call out other corrupt people. There doesn't have to be a "good guy" even if the claim is legitimate. The person who is the "good guy" in one circumstance can be the "bad guy" in other places where it serves them. Game-protect is most certainly corrupt, but calling him out doesn't make you above reproach.
This racket is not at all unique and is as old as time. Mafias and cartels have been using this method since societies existed. You either cooperate or they organize to harm your reputation, lively hood, or life itself.