You were arguing that the Nixon impeachment proceedings were a criminal proceeding. Go back and read what you wrote dude. You said it more than once. Instead of just admitting you weren't right you're really going to try and convince us that you never said what you were saying? Even though we're on an internet forum where our posts are saved?
Look, here's another example of you
not saying the Nixon Impeachment was a criminal proceeding!
The currently issued subpoenas have ZERO AUTHORITY under the law because they are issued OUTSIDE of this protocol, unlike the Nixon impeachment, which was a criminal proceeding, unlike the current investigation.
Nixon was being investigated under a criminal proceeding, which was the basis for subpoenas, which he defied, which was the basis for the article of impeachment against him. Anything else is just you attempting to redefine my argument and demanding I defend your interpretation.